#128090 - 11/26/01 11:37 AM
Re: spey vs conventional
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 10/08/01
Posts: 1147
Loc: Out there, somewhere
|
I fish both spey and conventional fly gear, as well as plenty of conventional gear. Spey rods are great for certain kinds of water: water that you are intending to cover with a standard wet fly swing without retrieving the fly. For this water, they let you cover the water more easily than a standard rod.
For small water, and short, dunky sorts of casts, they are more trouble than they are worth.
I took a 7 wgt spey rod with me to alaska this year, and did well with it on big 'bows. It was great for reaching the middle of the river from stretches where you had brush at your back.
_________________________
Hm-m-m-m-m
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#128095 - 11/27/01 12:25 PM
Re: spey vs conventional
|
Smolt
Registered: 04/20/01
Posts: 93
Loc: Seattle, Wa
|
Properly used, a spey rod will prove to be a superior tool in almost all anadromous fishing situations. The longer rod offers better line control, better casting accuracy and makes it easier to fight big fish. I often use a spey cast when nymphing for trouts with a 5wt single hander as well. Fly fishing for steelhead is truly the pinnacle of sport fishing. Grab a spey rod and join the adventure- there is always something new to learn. Remember, anyone can catch fish with bait.
_________________________
enjoy!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#128096 - 11/27/01 05:32 PM
Re: spey vs conventional
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 04/18/99
Posts: 125
Loc: Bothell, WA
|
I made the switch to a double handed rod 3-4 years ago now. Are they pricey? Yes. Are they worth it? Without a doubt. The reasons why have pretty much been covered by others posts but I will add one more.
Ease on your body. I do a lot of winter fishing with tips. A full day on the river with a single hand 10' 8 weight and a Type VI tip would send me running for the Ibuprofin for back and shoulder pain. With the spey, there is no false casting so fewer casts and using both hands greatly reduces the wear and tear on your body.
As for a spey not allowing you to "flyfish", that is bunk. You cna do anything with a spey that you can with a single hander. A single handed rod does excel in some areas, close in work chief among them.
If you decide to make the plunge, good luck! It can be addictive.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#128097 - 11/27/01 05:44 PM
Re: spey vs conventional
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 11/24/00
Posts: 377
Loc: The Terrace
|
Hey A D Pose Tell the truth Witch way do you catch more fish, Fly or Gear ?
_________________________
Bait thug AKA 98043
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#128099 - 11/27/01 07:58 PM
Re: spey vs conventional
|
Smolt
Registered: 04/20/01
Posts: 93
Loc: Seattle, Wa
|
One thing you'll notice about fly fishing (spey or conventional) for steelies is that it is much easier to feel takes than drift fishing.
_________________________
enjoy!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#128101 - 11/27/01 10:26 PM
Re: spey vs conventional
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 03/10/00
Posts: 347
Loc: West of Eden
|
I use a 11'6'' "spey", actually I just call it my 8/9 wt. 2-hander since it's not a traditional spey. Made out of an anglers workshop blank and works mint for the small brushy spots for roll casting and tight lining nymphs and jigs. I've posted several times on the technique. I've gone to using it more than my single handed 8wt. loomis although it is a bit stiff for my liking. Oh well, buy another one in a year or so and feed the sickness.
_________________________
Chasing old rags 500 miles from home.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
2 registered (Tug 3, Excitable Bob),
1072
Guests and
1
Spider online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
11499 Members
17 Forums
72918 Topics
824880 Posts
Max Online: 3937 @ 07/19/24 03:28 AM
|
|
|