#470507 - 11/27/08 12:27 PM
Re: Office of the President Elect
[Re: kevin lund]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 11/26/06
Posts: 4317
Loc: South Sound
|
Irie,
You too can lick my nuts! I expect nothing more out of you. I suppose you think I have a "purty mouth." If KKKevin took you fishing and you woke up with a condom hanging out of your ass, would you be surprised?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#470513 - 11/27/08 12:36 PM
Re: Office of the President Elect
[Re: ]
|
Reverend Tarpones
Registered: 10/09/02
Posts: 8379
Loc: West Duvall
|
Let us not forget either that the current bailouts have the full faith and blessing of the POTUSE and his economic advisers. I am sure though that if there are any items that need changing, they will be done shortly after Jan. 20.
Obama is not my main concern at this point. What concerns me most is what Pelosi/Reid have in mind. The original 700 BILLION got an additional 110 BILLION in pure pork added.
Concessions will be made by both parties but in the long run this is going to cost us taxpayers TRILLIONS. Hank: I know its mind boggling but the numbers they are tossing around are Trillions, not Billions. While the resolution of this mess will be left to Obama, let us not forget whose watch it occurred on. Bush spent like a drunken sailor, and then ended his fiscal orgy with a 700 Trillion handout his corporate buddies who proved to be as incompetent as his administration. (Now that really was welfare!) I don't really know what Bush was, but it sure as hell was not a fiscally responsible Republican. It's too early for us to know what Obama will be, but it would be hard to imagine he could be any worse. The big difference is Bush took office with a balanced budget, a large surplus and a nation respected by the world. Obama takes office with two wars, a huge deficit that is growing by the minute, an economic crisis unmatched since the great depression and seriously damaged international relationships. We need to be supporting our president in a time of crisis. Anything less is unpatriotic. Sure criticize when he screws up, as he surely will, but for God’s sake we need to be as supportive as possible in these troubled times.
_________________________
No huevos no pollo.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#470516 - 11/27/08 12:38 PM
Re: Office of the President Elect
[Re: kevin lund]
|
The Chosen One
Registered: 02/09/00
Posts: 13942
Loc: Tuleville
|
Wait about a year and see how many people are out of work. this country/government cant opperate without money. You DO realize that all of our problems a year from now all have stemmed from the Bush Administration and the "legacy" he left us (and you). Anyone unemployed in a year can than GW. Not like GW will care, as he's a fat-cat millionaire sitting in his Texas ranch laughing all the way to the bank with Cheney. Too damn funny.
_________________________
Tule King Paker
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#470528 - 11/27/08 01:04 PM
Re: Office of the President Elect
[Re: ]
|
Reverend Tarpones
Registered: 10/09/02
Posts: 8379
Loc: West Duvall
|
Hank: You remind me of one of my best friends who is a very conservative republican. You are able to hold a discussion that involves actual thinking and no name calling. I enjoy give and take with you. Some, as you say, simply rely on grade school name calling. They are not worth wasting time talking to. As you say there is plenty of blame to go around. Anyone who thinks this is mess is all Bush's fault or that Obama's election will somehow doom us all, simply isn't thinking.
Have great Turkey Day.
_________________________
No huevos no pollo.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#470532 - 11/27/08 01:33 PM
Re: Office of the President Elect
[Re: ]
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 12/06/05
Posts: 461
|
Here's an article from 1999 before GW was president that pretty much forcasted what would happen if the economy slowed. From New York Times Article "In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's" Read more New York Times Article 1999
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#470537 - 11/27/08 01:52 PM
Re: Office of the President Elect
[Re: JoJo]
|
Spawner
Registered: 12/23/01
Posts: 913
Loc: gales creek, or
|
Evindently you are mistaken too. Didn't you hear Parker tell us that it is all the Bush Administration's problem. Quoted by Parker You DO realize that all of our problems a year from now all have stemmed from the Bush Administration and the "legacy" he left us (and you).
Anyone unemployed in a year can than GW. Not like GW will care, as he's a fat-cat millionaire sitting in his Texas ranch laughing all the way to the bank with Cheney.
Too damn funny.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#470538 - 11/27/08 01:56 PM
Re: Office of the President Elect
[Re: kevin lund]
|
Dah Rivah Stinkah Pink Mastah
Registered: 08/23/06
Posts: 6210
Loc: zipper
|
Sometimes it's good to open your eyes and see what's going on around you instead of looking straight ahead all the time.
_________________________
... Propping up an obsolete fishing industry at the expense of sound fisheries management is irresponsible. -Sg
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#470542 - 11/27/08 02:11 PM
Re: Office of the President Elect
[Re: JoJo]
|
Reverend Tarpones
Registered: 10/09/02
Posts: 8379
Loc: West Duvall
|
Here's an article from 1999 before GW was president that pretty much forcasted what would happen if the economy slowed. From New York Times Article "In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's" Read more New York Times Article 1999 Looks like they nailed that one. I thinkl Obama needs to convene a bipartisan panel to investiget exactly what went wrong. I really don't too much care who is found to blame. I think Dems had a hand as did Repubs. So be it. Let's find out what happened and do what ever it takes to keep it from happening again. I do know Clinton was an advocate for more loans to low income families. I know Bush was fully supportive of that and the Phil Graham pushed hard for less regulation. Plenty of blame. Now what's the solution?
_________________________
No huevos no pollo.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#470578 - 11/27/08 05:52 PM
Re: Office of the President Elect
[Re: kevin lund]
|
WINNER
Registered: 01/11/03
Posts: 10363
Loc: Olypen
|
I think the thing that annoys me most about the present situation is the adamant claims of some that, "It ain't my fault." While I certainly will agree, if the ones so claiming are also the ones who have been financially responsible, but I believe it is painfully obvious that such is not the case. It is to these people I ask, "How's your "look good" doing now?" What we will all now witness, and which is at least partially to blame for your teachings in irresponsibility, will be higher crime rates, higher suicide rates, higher divorce rates, and on and on. And there is no way to stop it. Sweet. Does anyone think that those who have spent and continue to spend beyond their ability to pay are now suddenly going to be willing to be responsible for their indebtedness? They have grown accustomed to living that way and will NOT be willing to do without in order to pay off the debts they have incurred. They will walk away and leave the mess to be cleaned up by others.....like a hurricane with fresh ground in front and disaster behind and no way to stop it. The Brick Wall prediction was not a prediction.....neither is the wall we are headed at right now.......they're just facts. Bury your head in the sand and pretend it ain't happening.....go ahead....won't change a thing. But at least try to find something more substantial to blame your woes on than Bush.....that's just plain
_________________________
Agendas kill truth. If it's a crop, plant it.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
1 registered (Streamer),
1094
Guests and
13
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
11499 Members
17 Forums
72942 Topics
825231 Posts
Max Online: 3937 @ 07/19/24 03:28 AM
|
|
|