...and in my opinion much less likely than 'controlled demolition'.

...but, because I am open to the idea that I could be wrong about this, if you feel like you have the wherewithall, go ahead and present to us all the hard evidence for the 'collapse by fire' theory.

Believe me, this is the version I would rather believe so I'm eager to find something new here.

speed kills?

h2O,

How did it happen?

A bunch of Muslim Maggots hijacked some US aircraft. These large aircraft that were full of fuel ran into the buildings, setting them on fire. As the structures heated up the steel beams supporting the structures collapsed.

Buildings fell down. Lots of people died.

Haven't you got anything better to do (more productive) than sit around and try to find ways to bash your government and accuse them of horrific crimes of which you have not a single shred of admittable evidence?

Get a life!

Mike

It could have been that the airplanes were suppossed to impact at the very second the charges were set-off...if the U.S. govt tried that they would probably be a couple hours out of sync. Has anyone considred that the planes were on Eastern time, but the "shaped charges" were set to Central time......................OMG !

nice evidence

h2o,

Here is something for your open mind.

How do we know that you are not one of the conspirators? Perhaps you are poking for ideas that will inevitably cover you and your fellow conspirators assess. I recomend to everyone on this board not to interact to h20 about 911 conspiracy topics because h2o did them.


Oh yeah! The dust in your avitar contains thermite.

I didn't know that inthects could eat thue steel.

That might be the next conspiracy h2o tries to spin.

It doesn't sound to me like h2o is trying to "spin" anything?

It sounds like he's trying to get you people to temporarily suspend your political biases and preconceptions about the 9/11 events, examine this evidence objectively and draw your own conclusions.

If the mere suggestion of this makes you angry and defensive... which it would appear that it does... then we are left to conclude that you are incapable anyway.

I wasn't Aunty.

I don't really believe that the government was involved in any conspiracies concerning 9/11 either.

My comment was directed at those who can't seem to see that h2o is just attempting initiate some rational debate on the topic.

This sounds like a job for the MythBusters...

Are you related or something? Why dont you lay down your Piscatorial Pursuits "is there life beyond fishing" biases and the biases you have for the members that post. Actualy contemplate that h2o could be Osama bin Laden himself (or a buddy) poking fun of Americans on a fishing website. Is this possible. Yes. Is this a conspiracy about the thread starter. Yes. Could it be debunked. Probably if h2o were willing to lay that much information about his/her self publicly. Please dont h2o. Just using you to broaden the idea that conspiracies imaginative becuase humans imagine them.


Please hit me with the spelling joke. Its my fav
J7 dont spell to good no how

aunty

what you've posted I've seen before in various debunking articles and blogs. I believe it comes from the NIST report? If you could you get me the source for that stuff?

Now, as for its content...a theory has been laid out that is made to sound plausible. I'll go that far with you....the problem I've had with it is that I can't find any hard physical evidence to support that theory. There is growing evidence however, physical as well as circumstantial, of controlled demolition.

Therein lies one of the major problems I have with the whole deal, where'd the evidence go and why did it get there in such an all fired hurry? If nothing else I find it suspicious that it took over 400 days to begin an investigation but they were hauling out debris (read: crime scene evidence) within days. A poor, amateurish, swiss cheese investigation is why we are where we are today in terms of a divided public on this issue.

Again when it comes to hard physical evidence there is little to nothing except the 'word' of our government when it comes to the 'official' story. The scraps of physical evidence that do exist further support the 'controlled demolition' theory, IMO. I am eager to digest further evidence no matter which way it points, when it becomes available.

The last six months here, this place has been more like one of the BBS's dedicated to Assault Rifles.
Paranoids, fundamentalists, & racist asshats come with that territory.