Wake me up when Greenland is green again, will you?

That's not an opinion.

That's a fact.

You seem to have some trouble telling the difference sometimes.

My opinion is you don't know sh!t half the time, but you pretend to 100% of the time.

My opinion is you can't put 7 billion tons of carbon into the atmosphere yearly and have no negative effect.

But that's just an opinion.

The part about you talking out your ass half the time was a fact..........I just called it an opinion to make you feel better.

Just to keep your record at 100%, Dan's a fn donkey.

I'm leaning strongly toward Dan's opinion cuz he actually seems to understand science, not just cuz he has a lighter and sets people on fire. Whereas Hank C&Ps "eminent" scientists who counter the conclusions of other eminent scientists. Since none of us are climate scientists, eminent or otherwise, it's like he expects to persuade us with eminence.

I'm a scientist, but I'm not a climate scientist. I've read the [censored] from both sides of the climate street, and I can't decide if anyone is right. The discipline is too specialized for a scientist from another field to critically evaluate it. What a lot of folks don't seem to understand is that science often doesn't yield concrete conclusions. Evidence supports or leans toward one conclusion more than another, or give an answer like it's 95% probable that this conclusion would be correct 87% of the time. Most folks don't find answers like that acceptable, even if they are the best and most accurate answers in existance. So the conclusions often get butchered into something simple enough for the lay media and citizen to understand, even tho it's not accurate.

Meanwhile, the rivers I want to fish this weekend are too high or too low or rising too steeply. Gonna' tie crab patterns for permit I guess.

Sg

I don't give my opinion?

Seriously?

Saying sh!t like that is going to get you either drug tested or involuntarily committed at the nearest psych ward.

Why do you even say such preposterous sh!t?

Yet many of those folks believe in a literal interpretation of the Bible. Go figure.

I loved that album, "I think we are all Bozos on this bus" Firesign Theatre if memory serves.

Yep. I also fondly remember the automated pushover machine.Forget "her" name.

Damn Hank, I'm liking you more all the time. Too bad yer such a RWWJ. Fact is several of my buddies are as well. Hell I view that as a fault similar to Todd's cheap beer habit, KKs longwinded rants, Addicted's obsessvie compulsive neatness disorder and Parkers pro status bragging.

I only drink cheap beer when I'm fishing...or if I'm buying for everyone else, too

Fish on...

Todd

Yes, you can sip on them most the day out fishing without getting a buzz, and cans are much easier and safer to store in the boat

I don't particularly like to piss, especially when I have to pull my damn waders down!

Fish on...

Todd

Fish with some different guys Todd, you might lose that fear of pulling your waders down.

Jerry....

Todd......in a few more years, LIKE with have nothing to do with it.

It's like a person with a migraine headache who goes to the doctor and is diagnosed with a brain tumor.
Then seeing 20 more doctors who come to the same diagnoses.
But then the patient sees one more doctor who says take two aspirins you'll be fine.
Sorry wing nuts majority rules.

The scientific consensus is clear, climate change is happening, and man has a hand in it.
Framing this as some left wing sinister plot to get global polluters to stop polluting our planet, falls under f'n donkey ballwashers that like to play the "agenda driven junk science card".
But I already knew you don't know sh1t about science, much less what it says or means.
But this is what I would expect from a bitter old gas bag.

The reason "why" is NOT clear.....nobody disputes that the climate is changing (previously sworn to as "global warming").....as always.
Remember hair spray/R-12/ozone depletion relationship? Science was clear there too. Good thing Ma quick using that stuff, huh?
Ever look up what killed George Washington? Science was clear then too.
The only thing that IS clear is that people who suck up the "science" without question need to gain a little "open eyes" experience. And your pissy little name-calling bitch session shows that you certainly lack it.

That explains it.

So you missed the part about out migration problem through PS?
And did you look at the map showing PS trib habitat conditions?
Or do you think healthy robust wild steelhead runs will flourish with poor habitat?
You really ought to pay closer attention, or is everything you don't agree with on disregard?
How about low crab abundance? If you researched it you'd find over harvest isn't a factor, it's climatic conditions in the spring that determines abundance.

Gore is still a hypocrite of the highest order.