#924092 - 03/03/15 02:16 PM
Re: 48" leader restriction
[Re: l3r]
|
Spawner
Registered: 07/11/08
Posts: 528
Loc: alaska and washington
|
You are gonna have to defined the term "leader"
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#924103 - 03/03/15 03:32 PM
Re: 48" leader restriction
[Re: l3r]
|
King of the Beach
Registered: 12/11/02
Posts: 5199
Loc: Carkeek Park
|
48" + leader = twice baked humpies Coming to a river near you this fall Yummy
_________________________
Go Dawgs! Founding Member - 2025 Pink Plague Opposition Party #coholivesmatter
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#924109 - 03/03/15 03:56 PM
Re: 48" leader restriction
[Re: ]
|
RobertF
Unregistered
|
It isn't the 48" leader length that is the problem it is the guys out there with a 48 IQ managing our fisheries. fixed
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#924120 - 03/03/15 04:53 PM
Re: 48" leader restriction
[Re: ]
|
Juvenile at Sea
Registered: 09/05/14
Posts: 195
Loc: Stanwood WA
|
It isn't the 48" leader length that is the problem it is the guys out there with a 48 IQ managing our fisheries. fixed +1
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#924121 - 03/03/15 04:55 PM
Re: 48" leader restriction
[Re: Roy Otis]
|
ExtenZe Field Tester
Registered: 11/10/09
Posts: 7960
Loc: Vancouver, WA
|
The motion has been seconded by Dan S. All in favor? In favor, but I would like to extend to the condemned, a choice of two punishments. 1) Standard beating about the head, neck and chest. 2) Option for a standard Indonesian-style caning. Number of lashes TBD at streamside.
_________________________
NO STEP ON SNEK
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#924122 - 03/03/15 05:00 PM
Re: 48" leader restriction
[Re: l3r]
|
Carcass
Registered: 01/09/14
Posts: 2298
Loc: Sky River(WA) Clearwater(Id)
|
If there was a larger enforcement presence, there would be no reason to restrict leader length because the snaggers would either eventually get caught in act or fear being caught and adapt their strategy to legal means of take. Creating more rules and regs is not a substitute for enforcement or for that matter common sense.
_________________________
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#924130 - 03/03/15 06:36 PM
Re: 48" leader restriction
[Re: 5 * General Evo]
|
BUCK NASTY!!
Registered: 01/26/00
Posts: 6312
Loc: Vancouver, WA
|
a shorter leader makes it easier to snag...it keeps the hook lower where the fish are, there is less resistance when the hook is set from the swivel to the hook point, ect.... look at what the tribal guys that snag use, they dont use 40 foot leaders, and there is a reason for that....
snagging will still be around, because that is intent... flossing will be curbed to a point, but people will eventually figure out ways around it like always....
also, what about spoon and spinner fisherman? will they be affected? Well said......... Length of leader is a following (monkey-see monkey-do), short leaders do just fine for flossing/snagging fish. Keith
_________________________
It's time to put the red rubber nose away, clown seasons over.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#924147 - 03/03/15 10:01 PM
Re: 48" leader restriction
[Re: l3r]
|
Spawner
Registered: 07/11/08
Posts: 528
Loc: alaska and washington
|
I viewed the proposed rule, even includes a bobber required rule. HOWEVER I did not see anywhere where there is a definition of what a "leader" is. Looked in the pamphlet. Anybody got the definition? Are the fly guys out of luck? I will call the agency tomorrow.
Edited by gregsalmon (03/03/15 10:02 PM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#924161 - 03/04/15 08:20 AM
Re: 48" leader restriction
[Re: l3r]
|
Spawner
Registered: 07/11/08
Posts: 528
Loc: alaska and washington
|
Well, I have talked to four people so far, nobody is able to define what a leader is.....more to follow.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#924170 - 03/04/15 10:15 AM
Re: 48" leader restriction
[Re: Bent Metal]
|
My Area code makes me cooler than you
Registered: 01/27/15
Posts: 4564
|
If there was a larger enforcement presence, there would be no reason to restrict leader length because the snaggers would either eventually get caught in act or fear being caught and adapt their strategy to legal means of take. Creating more rules and regs is not a substitute for enforcement or for that matter common sense. Very well said. Anyone that doesn't agree is an idiot.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#924180 - 03/04/15 12:03 PM
Re: 48" leader restriction
[Re: gregsalmon]
|
Ornamental Rice Bowl
Registered: 11/24/03
Posts: 12618
|
I viewed the proposed rule, even includes a bobber required rule. HOWEVER I did not see anywhere where there is a definition of what a "leader" is. Looked in the pamphlet. Anybody got the definition? Are the fly guys out of luck? I will call the agency tomorrow. A good definition would be... Whenever a weight is attached to the line, leader length equals the distance from the attachment of said weight to the terminal hook.
_________________________
"Let every angler who loves to fish think what it would mean to him to find the fish were gone." (Zane Grey) "If you don't kill them, they will spawn." (Carcassman) The Keen Eye MDLong Live the Kings!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#924186 - 03/04/15 12:43 PM
Re: 48" leader restriction
[Re: l3r]
|
The Chosen One
Registered: 02/09/00
Posts: 13942
Loc: Tuleville
|
Keep it civil, please.
Penny just had to delete some less-than-civil posts on this thread and that pisses Penny Paker off.
To no end.
You won't like Penny Paker when it is mad.
_________________________
Tule King Paker
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#924188 - 03/04/15 12:52 PM
Re: 48" leader restriction
[Re: l3r]
|
My Area code makes me cooler than you
Registered: 01/27/15
Posts: 4564
|
Around here the leader is defined as . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Wait for it
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Penny Parker.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#924192 - 03/04/15 01:47 PM
Re: 48" leader restriction
[Re: l3r]
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 02/24/11
Posts: 255
Loc: whale pass
|
so Doc the question comes to when no weight is used what is the leader?
I dead drift eggs in small streams all the time. It's my preferred method in clear water small stream fishing, works in lakes also,I don't think that's flossing? yet the same technique in the same stream and dirty water with moving fish can be flossing.
its not always what you are doing that makes it snagging.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#924226 - 03/04/15 07:15 PM
Re: 48" leader restriction
[Re: l3r]
|
Spawner
Registered: 07/11/08
Posts: 528
Loc: alaska and washington
|
Reporting back here. I talked to several people with WDFW and most of them referred me to Charmaine Ashford. She called me back after I left a message!
So she agreed with me that a definition was hard to find. HOWEVER she said its not really her thing, so somebody who did know the real deal would call me back soon.
I will report back as soon as they get back to me. How are we supposed to comment on a proposed rule if we don't know what the words in the rule mean?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#924232 - 03/04/15 08:32 PM
Re: 48" leader restriction
[Re: gregsalmon]
|
Ornamental Rice Bowl
Registered: 11/24/03
Posts: 12618
|
Reporting back here. I talked to several people with WDFW and most of them referred me to Charmaine Ashford. She called me back after I left a message!
I believe it's Ashbrooke
_________________________
"Let every angler who loves to fish think what it would mean to him to find the fish were gone." (Zane Grey) "If you don't kill them, they will spawn." (Carcassman) The Keen Eye MDLong Live the Kings!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#924258 - 03/05/15 09:11 AM
Re: 48" leader restriction
[Re: l3r]
|
Spawner
Registered: 07/11/08
Posts: 528
Loc: alaska and washington
|
Reporting again: Just got off the phone with Larry Phillips of WDFW. I was not able to get a definition of what a leader is. He wants us to meet and have a discussion about the issue and wanted to make sure that we know he feels the issue is NOT about snagging.
I still believe that if we are going to discuss it and come to ANY sort of reasonable conclusion we have to have that definition. I tried....
I don't really care what it is, I just need to know what it is so I can comply with the regulation. How silly would it be to discuss it, figure out the regulation and THEN figure out the definition?
If there is a biological reason to regulate leader length lets go for it. But we need to know what the damn thing is.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#924265 - 03/05/15 11:41 AM
Re: 48" leader restriction
[Re: l3r]
|
Spawner
Registered: 02/06/03
Posts: 754
|
A Google search for "salmon fishing leader" or "drift fishing leader" comes up with most of the answers to your very simple question. And why are you playing the phone directory like a piano? Larry? why not call curt or Ron or some other random biologist too Maybe they'd know. ..
Or you could just call a LEO in a district that will be writing these tickets, like for the skok maybe try Smith or Juet.
I don't think fly guys are part of the issue here so I doubt the regs are really looking at them. The rule was gonna be 20" min. And 48" max but this is what is out...flossing will be harder, the bump and rip crowd will probably line more fish in the head and mouth...and us real fishermen will have some more spots open to just us as well as the BEGINNING of what might be a turning point in these type of fisheries (one can hope).
_________________________
Fish gills are like diesel engines, don't run them out of fuel!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#924266 - 03/05/15 11:45 AM
Re: 48" leader restriction
[Re: l3r]
|
Spawner
Registered: 02/06/03
Posts: 754
|
And this year, lets get a [Bleeeeep!] ton of bait guys out there, drift or bobber i dont care! Just make sure you track down the fish checker and let him know what you got it on and your other info..
Apparently we need to prove to some WDFW desk jockies that a bait fishery will work here and if the playing fields are even will catch just as many as the "other" crowd...with a lower encounter rate to boot!
_________________________
Fish gills are like diesel engines, don't run them out of fuel!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
1160
Guests and
7
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
11499 Members
17 Forums
72942 Topics
825251 Posts
Max Online: 3937 @ 07/19/24 03:28 AM
|
|
|