how are they identifying and catching these Islamic and domestic terrorists so quick?

In most cases they are not relying on the public as they are purposely misleading the public IE: the Cascade mall shooter.

it seems that when the Feds get involved they know exactly who these shooters are within 24 hours or less, generally all the evidence they have is grainy surveillance video.

So how are they doing it? Facial recognition or cell phone pinging? It's one of the two. I suspect it's cell phones, somehow they are identifying these shooters via their cell phones, the GPS info must be stored somehow and they can go back and cross reference it to the surveillance videos. Thats the only explanation I can think of.....

logically there is no way they should be able to identify and catch these guys so fast, they must be using some kind of illegal technology, because they can't identify and catch normal criminals that fast....

If only they'd use some of this technology on Crooked Hillary.

The FBI is catching these guys quickly after the fact because they know who they are. These dirtbags have been known and often interviewed and released by the FBI. The FBI continues to fail to be proactive, instead preferring to be reactionary. They've failed the American public over and over but serve their masters well.

Do you propose they arrest them before a crime is committed?

Shall we just bring back internment camps? And fill them with them others?

Of course. As long as they are brown, at least.

Fish on...

Todd

surprised you haven't deleted this yet or made it ..................

please kindly fuk yourself or be a man and stand behind your diatribe.

?

Are you being serious, or is that your attempt at pithy? When a person makes a threat of violence against another person or group of person that is a crime. The FBI interviewed many of the past murderers because of threats they made. Once the FBI is aware that the person is a threat they should step up monitoring that person and deny the future purchase of weapons. What's so hard to understand about that very basic concept? When the FBI has been warned and fails to act that's a big problem.

Are you suggesting that threats of violence by ragheads should go unchecked? That the only way to act is after the known subject has killed innocent people. Perhaps you're of the opinion that if we banned guns the terrorists would be put out of business.

I know that this is a difficult thing for some "big thinkers" to wrap their little brain around but the FBI should take the threats seriously rather than dismiss them out of hand preferring instead to wait for the carnage before acting.

That's hate speech and I feel threatened. You should be tossed in the clink and your ability to own/buy firearms needs to be revoked.

Do you not see the slippery slope???? Do you not want to live in a free society? Or is it up to you to decide who can live with the freedoms bestowed upon us all and who cannot? Or should that decision be left up to the FBI?

Don't sweat it RVW, dust buster has lost it recently. The answer to the question about how they caught the mall shooter so quickly is with the public's help, like in most cases.

Don't sweat it RVW. Sol Duc has your back.

I'm sure that makes you feel so much better!

Lolol. You've lost it buster. Your incoherent ramblings aimed to please the liberals is pure stupidity. Investigating and following up on threats of mass violence is hardly a slippery slope. In fact it's one of the tasks assigned to law enforcement. There's a lot of territory in between investigating threats of violence and internment camps but I don't expect you to know that, only folks that don't have their head stuck up a liberals ass. If you want to articulate your ridiculous logic feel free to try but if you insist on looking like a jackass then congratulations, you've succeeded.

What is your specific problem with the FBI doing their job and being held accountable when they don't? Is it your belief that investigating crimes is racist?

I'd rather have someone like Sol Duc having my back than a clueless fu.ck that thinks everything ends in internment camps.

I feel about the same actually, got into some fish yesterday and will hit it again in a few hours when the the tide comes in. I love being so close to the hump and Copalis rivers. I'll never go back anywhere near the city again. I released a nice Sea run cutty around 18" yesterday.

Not sure how arguing against a police state is a liberal idea? In fact I'd think arguing that one should be able to live their life without fear of the thought police dropping the hammer on them is a pretty conservative argument.

If someone breaks federal law I hope the FBI nails them. But short of actually committing a crime I'm not sure what any LE group can do about it.

We can't police intent without first suspending civil rights.

LE investigates crimes they don't prevent them. And arguing that they should be stopping them is an incredibly scary thought to me that could spin out of control extremely quickly.

Not sure why that is so difficult a thing to understand. Your argument is sound right up until the time you are the target of that argument.

so then if cops dont prevent crimes, and they "serve and protect us", its our jobs as American citizens to stop crimes correct?

do you see where im about to go with this?

Not anywhere near a full time job, that's for sure.

why dont you go douche that mossy oak pussy of yours....

So where ya goin?