This is a pretty big deal, watch the two videos regarding a press release that happened on Feb 2.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1k_b-jmz3k

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5vMzW2XyEk

They were fairly "vanila" with the release and decided to make it pretty simple and straightforward regarding the origination of this culture that arrived in Peru approximately 3,000 years ago, from an area between the Caspian and Black seas in the Caucus mountains of Crimea.

The information regarding the DNA haplogroups and blood types is not debatable yet there was no mainstream media coverage.

This study is going to show that these people were another species of human, and were advanced, likely these people were responsible for the megalithic structures in South and Central America as well as probably the great pyramids in Egypt. They used an unknown technology to cut and moves stones hundreds of tons, putting them together with no mortar so tight you can't even fit a human hair between. I know two people who have worked on this project and have been following it for the past 5 years.

Remains of people with the same characteristics have been excavated in Crimea as well but no DNA testing yet to prove they were from the same genetic lineage. Other than the skulls being so different and the bone density 60% greater there were other skeletal differences, such as additional ribs and vertebrae, 2 additional vertebrae and 4 extra ribs.

I never thought I'd see the day where I'm actually kinda glad one of Rich's posts took over the top spots. Thanks Rich!

Question: did any of these banana headed ancients have mail service?

Rich,

When you say "another species of human" that implies that they could not successfully interbreed with the human species as we know it. Is that really what you mean? If not, then what?

What do you mean by "unknown technology . . . ?" The ancient technology of stone cutting and setting and moving are pretty well understood by contemporary anthropologists and engineers, so what, exactly, do you mean?

It will certainly be interesting to see what comes of this and if there is any inter-relationship with Bigfoot and Gnomes.

Another species of human? Like Homo Somethingsomething?

Is it a mystery how the pyramids were built in kook land?

It does sound big, though. Easily as big as the gold-backed yuan.

weird thread

Hey Rich, I lnow where you can find another species of human.....in the mirror.

Salmo,


The Bigfoot DNA study showed that Bigfoot was a hybridized species, the male side is unknown and the female side was modern human. Based on what the Nuclear DNA showed whatever bigfoots original father was should not have been able to successfully cross with modern human females but it did, and it happened many times in many regions around 12,000 to 20,000 years ago. You can tell when it where it happened by the Haplogroup.

Yes, the royal family in this culture was the most pure, had the biggest skulls and skeletal differences. So yes they appeared to hybridize with modern humans as well, similar to bigfoot, yet very different.

As far as the megalithic structures, the biggest and most perfect construction is the oldest with attempted replication built onto and on top of. They can barely replicate that construction today and still cant do as perfect as a job.

Banned User,

Yeah right, there you go being a sheep.

Most classifications have Neanderthals and modern humans as separate species and the DNA evidence does show hybridization.

The definition of species is actually a human construction to define organisms. Nature is often not as "accurate".

For what it is worth, the Mule Deer (Rocky Mountain, California, Desert) are actually the result of Whitetails (bucks, I think) mating with Blacktail does. Which makes it truly interesting for the geneticist/classifier that the two "true" species in the mix are the WT and BT with the Mule being the hybrid offspring who have now become a full species and somehow absorbed, for classification purposes, the original species as a sunbspecies.

When I lived in NE Washington, I heard of whitetail/mule deer crosses, never saw one. Makes sense that it would happen some where their range overlaps.

This Paracas civilization is pretty weird, from the research it is thought that they fled the area of Crimea around 3,000 years ago as they were likely facing extermination. The remains that have been unearthed in Crimea are from around the same time frame as the ones in Paracas. They were in ancient Egypt as well, you can see evidence of that culture attempting to emulate the elongated skull. Akhenaten and his wife Nefertiti were thought to be possibly the same species as these Paracas people, as it is alleged that they had the same traits.

Its very possible that these elongated skull people were remnants from a previous lost advanced civilization such as Atlantis and Lemuria. They seemed to have died out at around 1900 years ago.

Another interesting fact is the presence of date palms in Paracas Bay which have been there since first white contact, no one knows how they got there and they only exist in Paracas go north or south they disappear, they exist naturally in the middle east.

There currently are crosses between WT and Mule; saw one in AZ. My point was that the species "Mule Deer" is the result of a cross between WT and BT.

Atlantis.

lol

"Atlantis.

lol"

Dan, that's a pretty nieve statement considering there is allot of evidence out there pointing to a lost civilization which influenced ancient man.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piri_Reis_map

How do you explain this map? somebody new the coastline of Antarctica well before it was thought that area was explored by ship, it's been a minimum of 12,000 years since it was iceless. It was not until relatively recently that we could use current technology to see what the coast line looks like without the ice and it just so happens that this map is almost perfectly accurate. So the fact is in 1513 the guy who made this map said that he referenced at least 5 ancient maps to draft this map. Someone prior to Antarctica being covered by ice charted the coastline either by sea or by the air and it happened at least 12,000 years ago. That is a fact so how would you explain that utilizing the belief system you have built for yourself? There are many examples that science has not been able to explain but this one is very direct.

I believe in mermaids but struggle with the fact they have no legs.

WT - Muley hybrids are not all that rare along the WYO / CO / NE / KS corridor where the Rockies give way to the Great Plains. Not all that common, but also not unheard of. WT bodies and flag tails, Muley racks. They're pretty cool to come across.

Rich - what are your thoughts on those giant "human" skeletons or the "hobbit" skeletons? As far as Squatch goes, we did have giant great apes in NA as recent as the beginning of the last ice age. Any chance one of those apes had his way with Mrs. Grog?

I don't know about all those DNA studies, but the DS is all the proof I need that Neanderthal DNA flares up every now and again.

http://www.ancientdestructions.com/piri-reis-map-of-antarctica/
ancient map of antartica

blob:https://www.youtube.com/d4d49044-34a9-4ab6-bd33-b672ba6d9db2
NASA map w/wo ice

Gigantopithecus, there is no way that is bigfoot, if bigfoot was only a giant ape or relic hominid we would have one in a cage a long time ago. How can you explain with all the technology, game cameras and such and very little photographic evidence and no flawliss photos or video, best film or photographic evidence was shot with an 8mm camera in 1967, now everybody has an HG video camera in their pocket and millions of remote cameras are deployed around the world by private people and research programs yet they cant replicate or outdo the 1967 8mm film. I dont think a giant ape or a caveman is smart enough to evade all that technology.

How do I explain that map?

It was made by dudes in the 1500's that thought the Earth was flat. Columbus called indians "Indians" because he thought he was in India.

If Atlantis existed, find it. People have been trying for decades - and nope.

Occam's razor. Learn it, know it, live it.

Be sure to post when it's found - or bigfoot is found - or gnomes are found - or the yuan collapses the dollar - or Trump gets elected.

OH - forget that last one.

Well, the easiest explanation is bigfoot doesn't exist and the technology works just fine.

Occam's razor.

People hate it.

"It was made by dudes in the 1500's that thought the Earth was flat. Columbus called indians "Indians" because he thought he was in India."

Exactly "made by dudes in the 1500's that thought the Earth was flat" they had very limited first hand knowledge of world geography because they had not been to most of it by 1500. It means that maps existed which were pretty accurate depicting lands which were never seen by navigators in the 1500's yet the maps existed from 100's of years or even thousands of years earlier. Its alleged that Columbus had access to Knights Templar maps which were made from maps that they found in the Holly Lands in the first crusade.

Melba does not see them, but according to her they frequent her property.

I know I have not been swindled because I know the context of the samples I sent in and I have 2 first hand visual encounters from close proximity.

Dan,

http://www.theblackvault.com/documentarc...oot-references/

Army corps of engineers, 1975, fairly compelling disclosure. Even talks about hair samples tested by the FBI.

I know the guy who owns this page "the black vault" its all unclassified documents he obtained via FOI requests. Pretty interesting stuff if you have time to look at it.

"Pretty accurate" is great, but you know what we have now? Actual photos of the whole Earth. So, no - I am not impressed by "pretty accurate" maps. Or crystals. Or ouija boards. Or essential oils.

I wouldn't buy the coelacanth story, either, but one was caught. And there were pictures. And then an actual specimen.

Believe me when I say I will change my tune any time you come up with a photo, or some actual evidence for Atlantis, bigfoot, gnomes, and any other thing you are sure exists.

It's not asking a lot. You know Nate's blurry moon pics? I accept them as evidence the moon exists. I will do the same with any photo you can produce of a bigfoot, gnome, or Atlantis.

I got you covered Rich

Eyewitness testimony is so unreliable it shouldn't even be considered evidence in a legal proceeding.

Dan, I don't get it?

An actual real elf that does not believe in Gnomes, Bigfoot or anything else.

I guess when Santa had you evicted from the North Pole for making [Bleeeeep!] toys he had you lobotomized by ferries who sprinkled grumpy dust and forget everything dust on you. Now your just a grumpy elf who doesn't know he an elf.

Sory Dan, I had to take a shot, your just disagreeing with me just because and not even considering what I propose in good faith, your not even giving it a legitimate consideration based on the available information.

It's all good.

Because stirring the pot is so much fun.....

Just for grins, let's assume that Bigfoot lives in Mt Rainier and in Olympic NP. Further, they are nocturnal, live in the forest, are smart enough to consciously avoid humans, and live in low densities. If one was out there and 100 m from the trail, would you see it? My point is that we actually visit/see a tiny fraction of the landscape. Just because a million folks visit the area doesn't mean that the whole area is searched/viewed.

Not saying they're out there, but that there are lots of places where we never really look.

Refer back to the effort Todd describes about chasing those BT is a small path of woods.

Cool story, but what about droppings, hair samples, skeletal remains, etc. They police up all that stuff?




Possible? Sure.

Probable? No.

Bigfoot loves Huckleberry smoothies.

Very little fecal evidence when he is consuming them.

Good lord.
My friend just bought a cabin right there on the Forest Service ground.
I sure hope he doesn't hear any wood knocking, cabin slaps, or fluid squirts.

If they managed to stay away from the trails the remains/hair/etc would be similarly hard to find. Not saying they exist but we really don't examine, closely, a whole lot of territory.

I used to do spawner surveys in a couple creeks. We'd do 100% of the anadromous zone weekly from September through June, counting salmon and steelhead. We had the advantage of knowing how many fish were in the creeks (2-4m wide) because we counted them above a rack. We saw less than 10% of the steelhead and 20-30% of the coho on the really clear days. They were there, just hidden.

I hear what you are saying CM. No, I don't believe in Squatch. BUT, there are entire small mountains & valleys just off the side of the road that see ZERO people year round. I can think of one area that has a log book up on a peak. It has 10 entries all time. Nobody goes in there and it's as wild as can be and for good reason...it's a miserable bitch to get into.

It's my tendency to not believe. I actually need evidence.

Of anything.

I don't discriminate against bigfoot. Get some decent evidence and I'm open to change my mind.

Decent evidence isn't a house slap or rocks being thrown by an unseen creature.

Here's some interesting evidence from last month... pics included

http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=58937

Wow, OLD snow boot tracks.

A day old Sherlock with a stride you can't match. Listen to this story for a pucker factor....even if b.s. it'll make you keep the lights on.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWjc1DvSbgY

Back east somewhere, I think Missouri, they did a study where they radio tagged Whitails (inside a fenced area) and the hunters. It was something like a couple days before any hunter saw a deer, a week before they saw a buck. If memory serves, they took a hunter to within 10' of a bedded buck that remained unseen.

In Florida, they are trying to get rid of invasive pythons. They radio tagged some and the bios would be within feet of an adult and not see it.

I agree we need proof but absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

The absence of evidence means it's a nifty tale.

The end.

Are you telling me God created Bigfoot?

I'll need Rich's take on this.

Dan,

I don't believe that God made bigfoot but I do believe that God made us.

I think Bigfoot came from what the bible and the book of Enoch call Nephilim. I believe that Bigfoots are a further diluted version due to continued interbreeding with humans. So it's likely that bigfoots have no soul.

I could be wrong about that but that's the way I lean, makes the most sense to me.

Bigfeets are gingers now? I'm trying to keep up, but this chit is confusing.