I've read your posts, you think it's up to the individual and the families to bail someone out. I'm saying, what if the invidual can't and the family has no money, your response came in the form of "not fit for breeding". that's your stance, plain and simple. Actually let me cut and paste from yur above post: "Many believed that those who couldn't take care of themselves were to blame for their own misfortunes." That is your stand point. I agree that the government does a poor job, but to take it away from the people that need it is completey ****ing stupid, especially since your best argument is that they shouldn't be taking out of your pocket to give to someone else. You cannot count on people to help others, obviously, and the money from your taxes is for just that, a social program to help the less fortunate, like it or not. What's the alternative?? Tell me smart guy, what do you believe should be the system for people that fall in the category of needing assistance and noone available to give it to them. you have a hard enough time justifying paying taxes because "uncle sugar" isn't spending your money on "fit breeders", Am I to believe that you are going to go and help a family you're not related to and give a helping hand on your own??
_________________________
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!"
President Merkin Muffley