Bob,
Ah ha! Got it! It might have taken me 200 years to figure that one out without your assistance..... Maybe the tribes, feds, along with the states game agencies and policy makers(Wa in particular), privately funded researchers and scientists, volunteer groups along with the local and national organizations supporting or assisting fisheries related issues need at some point(like how about now)to come together in some fashion "have a chit- chat" and "revaluate" resource management issues. It seems to me that it is illogical to "assume" natural resources particularly in the case of fish (which move over wide areas vs trees and shrubs) need to be readdressed continually or periodically as time marches forward. It is foolish to "assume" fish and their habitats remain in a constant state of flux & static motion. The dumbies that wrote and supported such decisions as the Bolt were greatly misguided and uninformed as to evolving conditions.