Originally, what I'd said was:

In reference to the Towers' attack, the evidence pointed to an imminent attack. It may have been hard to prevent the attack, but from reports I've read there was enough evidence that we should have known something big was about to happen. The blame doesn't necessarily point to the Bush regime, it falls mostly on the CIA and FBI not being able to play together. Their bureaucratic inability to share information with one other needs to be addressed.

The reference to bombing with drones was about bin Laden, not Hussein. The intel was presented in 2000, and in 2001 the drones still had not been outfitted with warheads. Again, this is not necessarily a Bush SNAFU as much as inter-agency squabbling, this time between the CIA and the Pentagon.


I openly admit that I don't completely trust any politician. I firmly believe they will tell you whatever you need to hear to further their own agenda. I listen to every one of them with a bit of skepticism.

I agree whole-heartedly with you on not attacking one another over party lines. I, too, believe we should punish whom ever is responsible for wrong-doing regardless of their political affiliation. And in this case I strongly believe the Bush adminstration has committed some serious wrongs that should be investigated, and subsequently punished if my suspicions are correct.