Solomon's biggest mistake was actually linking to the "case" (it's not, it's a petition for certiorari)...so that anyone could go read just how full of crap he is.

The Court said it is the EPA's job to make regulations that control the emission of CO2, no the Court does not make decisions like that...not because they think there's a controversy about climate change or not, but because it's not their job to make decisions like that, it's their job to review the decisions that others make.

The Court could have just as easily said "We have no position on whether or not the sky is blue", if they were discussing an agency's rule about such a thing...without meaning that they think there's a genuine controversy about the color of the sky.

Fish on...

Todd