You're right. I mis-read it. But, it does say "any" action that affects hunting. That would include hiring, firing, promotion. It would also include budgeting.

I heard, and have no way to confirm it, that the Tribes want hunting rights expanded to statewide (no U&A/ceded area) and also to private land. I think their argument is that by destroying habitat through development, which reduces their hunting opportunity, the State violated the Treaty.