. . .

So in order for your claim to be true. Someone would have to be a multimillionare who has no income, is homeless without even a tent or clothes to shelter them that has no ID uses no services whatsover owns nothing is uninsured has no power no phone doesn't travel except on foot doesn't use the mail or own any stock in any company somehow avoids jury duty and buys absolutely nothing except food from the grocery store that they travel to on foot while naked. Even then taxes are still paid by the grocery store in the form of B&O tax, income tax and property tax for the store plus the income & payroll tax for the employees not to mention all the taxes the other businesses that wholesale and transport the food pay. So whoops he can't even eat now either better go forage food but make sure you don't hunt any game or fish because the license on that is a tax. So eat bugs while naked I guess. You would have to refuse all government welfare, medical care and social security because taxes would be paid by the government employees that administer these programs. You'd have to store whatever form your wealth is in on your person while naked because if it's sitting in a safety deposit box, bank account or investment portfolio then there are definitely taxes being paid then. Plus the form of your wealth you are carrying around would have to be something created tax free, the only thing I can think of that's possible here is gold dust you gathered without any tools but how would you store multimillions worth of gold dust without even being able to buy a sack to put it in so maybe you found one big nugget worth multimillions and you store it in your hand with no security or weapons of defense when you are sleeping unsheltered and you could never sell or barter the nugget because taxes would have to be paid so you can't use your wealth other than holding it in your hand which you would have to do 24/7 365 days a year. You would also have to avoid dying somehow and figure out how to live forever without any medicines technology or tools other than what you can scrounge up from public forests because of estate taxes. If someone is a multimillionaire and actually lives like this I would be legitimately impressed to the point I wouldn't expect them to pay for anything because they don't use literally anything ever. Even Ted Kaczynski's lifestyle is more extravagant than that. I would say being a sasquatch is a possible lifestyle here but no you have people like Rich G spending resources that he is getting taxed on searching for you so you can't even be a sasquatch that may or may not even exist either because Rich G fvcked that up for you. You would somehow have to stop social workers from searching for you for those homeless census they do because yes social workers are paying taxes. So in addition to drinking from mud puddles eating bugs while naked holding a gold rock forever without dying nobody could know or even suspect that you exist. Also since you said multimillionaires there would have to be at least two people doing this. Then they would also have to kill me with their gold rocks because now that I have thought of the concept of these non tax paying multimillionaires that may or may not even exist I'm going to start looking for them which involves paying taxes, so even if they don't exist they are causing taxes to be paid. Also by killing me taxes would have to be paid because even if I disappeared some type of search would be done by someone which expends resources that causes taxes to be paid. So the fact that I exist and have thought up the concept of the non tax paying multimillionaires living naked in the woods somewhere that I will start looking for falsifies your claim because your naked gold rock multimillionaires can't kill me because killing me requires paying taxes. If they kill me they are paying taxes, if they don't kill me my search for them causes paying taxes. Either way some taxes will be paid thus multimillionaires that pay no taxes cannot exist.

. . .

No, not even close. Lets say you took 100% of their wealth which is around $1.3 trillion. Figure a college degree costs around 100,000. That's 13 million college degrees. There are 19.6 million college students in the U.S. right now so even if those billionaires lose everything there still isn't enough to pay just for all the degrees just for the students we have now. Plus you can only confiscate 100% of their wealth once. Since we can't even cover all the degrees for the current student with that money but only 66% of them this year and 0% of them for the year after that because there is no wealth to confiscate because you already confiscated it and in the process destroyed and liquidated every company in America and destroyed the world economy and now you are starving to death. Was paying 66% of college degrees for one year worth it?

Taxing the billionaires won't work because of math.

. . .

Who reads that crap?
Rambling nonsense with no paragraphs.
Life's to short, just say no to dumb asses.

There's nothing to evaluate, you like to hear yourself talk.

They way I see it is that 0% of republicans are willing to pay for this and the overwhelming majority of democrats are unwilling to pay for it, but there is a small number of far left democrats that claim to want to pay for this but in practice are unwilling to pay for it themselves. No nobody is willing to pay for this and the only people that are outraged about college forgiveness are outraged about the fact that other people are not willing to pay for something they themselves are unwilling to pay for.

Todd and people like him should pay for college loan forgiveness. You deserve exactly as much government services as you are able and willing to pay for. College loan forgiveness is a government service and Todd you can have as much as that service you are able and willing to pay for. Since nothing is stopping you from paying for other people's college degrees right now, you are obviously willing to pay zero and that's the exact amount of college loan forgiveness you are going to get, zero. That's fair reasonable and the natural and logical outcome of your behavior. So cut the sh!t and quit being outraged over it and advocating for it. Just go back to saying mean nasty hateful things about republicans like the bigot you are because at least some of that is funny and you seem to enjoy it.

As noted...if it happens it "is" my money that will be paying for it...I actually do pay taxes, a lot of them, and if I have to pay them I'd rather they go for something that benefits me, or society, instead of rich people who don't need any help.

Poor effort, again.

Fish on...

Todd

Wouldn't that be nice, having our taxes go where we want them to go to... Rather, it's tax, over promise and under deliver...

Keith

As noted...if it happens it "is" my money that will be paying for it...I actually do pay taxes, a lot of them, and if I have to pay them I'd rather they go for something that benefits me, or society, instead of rich people who don't need any help.

This would require government to be diligent with how they spend money. Governments are corrupt because corrupt people get into government, thus the importance of small governments to minimize corruption and waste. Bailouts first the rich, help for the poor, and nothing for the middle class that pays the taxes.

But people like Todd turn a blind eye to the inefficiencies and corruption of government. People like Todd love big government but hate greedy corrupt Republicans and turn a blind eye to the fact that Democrats do the same things and that corruption would be minimal if government was minimal in the first place.

Fallacy: Since Todd attacks Republican corruption, he likes big government and turns a blind eye to Democratic corruption.

Ad hominem: Todd turns a blind eye to corruption and inefficiencies.

Fallacy: Since Todd attacks Republican corruption, he likes big government and turns a blind eye to Democratic corruption.

Ad hominem: Todd turns a blind eye to corruption and inefficiencies.

Hopefully this helps.

Fish on...

Todd