But I’m shocked that a majority of American voters would choose a candidate who said (it’s on video) that he will be a dictator on day one.
This was a joke. Trump is a comedian, he has bits.
I’m shocked that a majority of American voters would chose for president who believe what Putin says over what his own intelligence agencies say.
Because our intelligence agencies are shameless liars of the worst order, they are also the ones in charge of the lying media.
I understand that a lot of Americans think the economy is bad, as Trump says, but every economic metric indicates that the US economy has been growing faster under Biden than it did under Trump.
The metrics are false. Fake numbers from a fake administration that has been papering over this problem for awhile.
As part of the response, both Trump and Biden drove up the US deficit by giving away “free money” to everyone. It’s not for me to say whether they should or shouldn’t have, but whenever a government just prints money – adding to the deficit – inflation always results.
Yes and who has been printing money for the last 3.5 years, Biden/Harris. This is why the inflation continues. But yes it started under Trump.
Over the past 50 years, surveys revealed that 65 to 75% of Americans want legal access to abortion. So color me more than slightly puzzled when a majority of American voters choose the candidate who eliminated federal protection of abortion rights.
Supreme Court turned it over to the states. This isn't an issue with this election because if Trump wins it's a state issue, if Kalama wins it's a state issue.
And over 60 lawsuits aimed at election fraud failed, most likely because there was none.
They were dismissed for lack of standing, not because there was no fraud. It was never actually litigated.
Trump promised he would return to the ideology of the era before 2021, when leaders believed in relying on markets to order the economy with the idea that wealthy individuals would invest more efficiently than if the government regulated business or skewed markets with targeted investment (in green energy, for example).
Yeah how are all those Green enegry investments working out? Maybe the people who generated the wealth in the first place ought to decide how to further invest their wealth rather than some uninterested third party bureaucrat.
Trump vowed to cut taxes for the wealthy and corporations and to make up lost revenue through tariffs, which he incorrectly insists are paid by foreign countries; tariffs are paid by consumers of the products subject to tarrif.
He's cutting everyone's taxes. Everyone who pays taxes will get taxes cut, not just the wealthy and corporations.
I take this to mean that federal employees and military personnel will no longer swear an oath to the US Constitution, but instead will have to swear loyalty to Trump.
Ok well what you take to mean is phucking insane like most of what you believe and is not well reflected in reality or ever going to happen.
Oh yeah, and about freedom of speech and a free press, Trump wants license revoked from NBC (for fact checking him during his debate with Harris. Never mind that if he weren’t an incessant liar he wouldn’t have to be fact checked all the time.) and from CBS because he didn’t like how they interviewed Harris on 60 Minutes. Of course Trump also had the chance to appear on the program, and he is now the first presidential candidate in over 50 years that the show has been on the air not to be interviewed. It’s going to be interesting to see next year if the first Amendment of the US Constitution will be subject to sane-washing in favor of Trump. That is how the press and TV work in Russia and Hungary.
Biden/Harris have been censoring the sh!t out of social media so don't suddenly pretend that your side cares about freedom of speech. The Republican party's platform has freedom of speech on it, your party's platform calls for more censorship. Quit accusing the other side of the things you are guilty of.
There is also no doubt that both racism and sexism played an important role in Harris’s defeat.
I doubt this is the case. What can be asserted without any evidence, can be dismissed without any evidence or argument.
White nationalist and Nazi Nick Fuentes posted, “Your body, my choice. Forever,” and gloated that men will now legally control women’s bodies. His post got at least 22,000 “likes.”
Nick Fuentes endorsed Harris so what exactly is your point here about Harris supporters?
Right-wing influencer Benny Johnson, previously funded by Russia, posted: “It is my honor to inform you that Project 2025 was real the whole time.”
This Russian disinformation guy, who I never heard of and just researched now, has no actual connection to Trump. I never said project 2025 wasn't real or it didn't have supporters, just that it wasn't Trump's project and he doesn't support it and hasn't even read it but he did comment that there are a lot of bad things in it. It's typical of Russian disinformation to post inflammatory content from both political extremes and that looks like what this is. I'm not sure what connection this is supposed to make to Trump.
Yesterday, Trump campaign press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump would launch the “largest mass deportation operation” of undocumented immigrants. We have no idea yet how this will play out or its effects on the US economy. Immigrants, many of them undocumented, play a crucial role in agriculture and the meat packing industries. I’ll say this again, but I think the correct number of undocumented immigrants is ZERO. Congress has kicked this can down the road for too many decades. Why? Partly because certain industries, owned and operated by political conservatives, like undocumented labor because they can pay them less than minimum wage. They can do so because if the worker complains, they are threatened with reporting and deportation. Slick system, for the owners, that is.
Yeah and unlike the Democrat party which is still beholden to those interests, which is why they are letting illegal immigrants in like mad, Trump is not. So we might have to pay people picking strawberries a living wage.
As for the lower prices Trump voters wanted, Kate Gibson of CBS today noted that on Monday, the National Retail Federation said that Trump’s proposed tariffs will cost American consumers between $46 billion and $78 billion a year as clothing, toys, furniture, appliances, and footwear all become more expensive. A $50 pair of running shoes, Gibson said, would retail for $59 to $64 under the new tariffs. U.S. retailers are already preparing to raise prices of items from foreign suppliers, passing to consumers the cost of any future tariffs.
Or you could buy the shoes made in America or buy the imported shoes and pay $9 to $14 more in tariffs. I don't understand why you care about this. Just buy American or pay the fee. I don't understand why you care or why I should care.
Also tariffs are not inflationary. As you established already in this very thread printing money to cover deficit spending is what causes inflation not tariffs. So say you pay $14 more on a pair of shoes, this does not cause inflation because you are only looking at the shoe. The $14 in tariffs that goes to the government reduced the deficit dollar for dollar so even though you pay $14 more on the shoe that $14 goes to reduce the deficit and thus inflation in the economy and "everything else" will cost that $14 less. Plus, you could just buy the American shoes if you don't want to donate the tariff money to reduce the deficit and inflation!
Trump’s election will also mean he will no longer have to answer to the law for his federal indictments: special counsel Jack Smith is winding them down ahead of Trump’s inauguration. Good idea since Trump said he will fire Smith and deport him the first second on day one of his administration. (Deport him for what? Doing his job?) So Trump will not be tried or held accountable for illegally retaining classified documents or attempting to overthrow the U.S. government when he lost in 2020.
Good because those are both fake frivolous cases with no actual legal basis in the law.