#108634 - 02/26/01 07:59 PM
33 pounder
|
Juvenille at Sea
Registered: 11/08/99
Posts: 204
Loc: Pacific Beach, WA, USA
|
Caution!!! If veiwing a dead wild steelhead offends you please hit your back button. This big guy came off the Quinault from the nets today. It weighed in at 32 pounds and 13 ounces. Total length was 43 inches and the girth was 23 1/2/ inches. You can see it at www.geocities.com/lettyrene/ under daily pics
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#108635 - 02/26/01 08:19 PM
Re: 33 pounder
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 02/27/00
Posts: 292
Loc: Playboy mansion
|
Letty, I followed the link to your daily pics and the 33 pounder is not pictured, but two guys are and one of them looks like Marty. Are the nexts coming out on the Quinault soon? I'm heading over there this Friday so it's nice to know there are some big boys coming through. Thanks
_________________________
Why settle for one when you can have hundreds?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#108637 - 02/26/01 08:37 PM
Re: 33 pounder
|
Juvenille at Sea
Registered: 11/08/99
Posts: 204
Loc: Pacific Beach, WA, USA
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#108638 - 02/26/01 08:51 PM
Re: 33 pounder
|
Parr
Registered: 01/04/01
Posts: 62
Loc: Port Orchard, Wa. USA
|
Sure would have been nice to see him Spawning in the upper river, sigh!!!!!!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#108639 - 02/26/01 09:48 PM
Re: 33 pounder
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 05/27/00
Posts: 2447
Loc: Stumpy Acres
|
...... ....... ....... ....... ------------------ "Just say HELL no to sovereign nation!!!!!" SRBC Boyz
_________________________
If ya can't run with the big dogs stay on the porch!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#108640 - 02/26/01 10:24 PM
Re: 33 pounder
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 02/27/00
Posts: 292
Loc: Playboy mansion
|
All I have to say too bad that fish got cut off on his spawning journey, but whoa!!! That is a $#%&#@! toad!!!!!
_________________________
Why settle for one when you can have hundreds?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#108641 - 02/26/01 10:35 PM
Re: 33 pounder
|
It all boils down to this - I'm right, everyone else is wrong, and anyone who disputes this is clearly a dumbfuck.
Registered: 03/07/99
Posts: 16958
Loc: SE Olympia, WA
|
Nets = 1 Steelhead gene pool = 0
_________________________
She was standin' alone over by the juke box, like she'd something to sell. I said "baby, what's the goin' price?" She told me to go to hell.
Bon Scott - Shot Down in Flames
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#108643 - 02/26/01 11:21 PM
Re: 33 pounder
|
Juvenille at Sea
Registered: 11/08/99
Posts: 204
Loc: Pacific Beach, WA, USA
|
nets =1 gene pool =1 Letty lost a bigger one up river 10 miles 2 weeks ago.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#108646 - 02/27/01 11:28 AM
Re: 33 pounder
|
Juvenille at Sea
Registered: 12/21/00
Posts: 112
Loc: Shelton, WA.
|
Well, here we go again. I dont want to be sending anyone spinning out of control unnecessarily, but has anyone considered the fact the Quinault do operate a hatchery and at least make an effort to sustain their own fisheries??? I dont know all the details about the fiscal side of the operation, but it seems at least they are somehow more entitled to harvest what they want. I dont believe they do a lot of fin clipping, so are you absolutely certain it's a wild fish?? There are other tribes as well, with hatcheries in operation, and I believe their right to harvest fish in their usual and accustomed locations and methods is better supported than those who dont. Dont misunderstand me, I still have a problem with non-selective totally lethal fishing methods.(Gillnets) I'd be right with you, if the fish in question had been from the Quilleute, Chehalis, or the Cowlitz system. Another couple of points to ponder. From all outward appearances, the Quinault seem to do a better job with their fishery program than the State. It may eventually work out that the state has to look to the Quinault for surplus eggs and milt to mitigate the genetic depletion of their own broodstock. Although it's nice to think of a fish like that returning to the gene pool, other considerations are in effect as well. The tribe doesnt maintain their fishery for aesthetic reasons. Consider their rights as well as your own. 'Nuff said for now.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#108647 - 02/27/01 12:15 PM
Re: 33 pounder
|
Spawner
Registered: 05/09/00
Posts: 915
Loc: Osprey Acres /Olympja
|
Sure the Quinalts have the best hatchery,probably on the west coast..why....because they are the only one s that get to fish it unless you want to fork out 300 bucks. I don't have a problem with them netting "Their" river but when I see boat loads of dead nates from the Chehalis and Hump systems etc.(Opps incidental catch).....Then I got a big problem
_________________________
[/b]The less I give a [Bleeeeep!] the happier I am[/b]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#108648 - 02/27/01 01:44 PM
Re: 33 pounder
|
Smolt
Registered: 02/16/01
Posts: 72
Loc: Seattle, WA, USA
|
Netting the natives is an unforgettable sin in my book. When I see that 32 pounder I am in reverie. When the tribes see it, they see about $25 worth of meat. Sorry about having to relate the harsh reality if that offends anyone. I am all for working out cooperative solutions to declining steelhead runs with the tribes, and I am a huge fan of their hatchery program, which protects wild genes. However...the bottom line is that the tribes are selling what people like myself consider precious for pocket change. Pretty damn pathetic.
_________________________
Release ALL wild fish, ban ALL nets
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#108650 - 02/27/01 11:03 PM
Re: 33 pounder
|
Parr
Registered: 01/04/01
Posts: 62
Loc: Port Orchard, Wa. USA
|
I keep hearing that they are there fish, It's there River, and that the lower section below the lake is. But that fish could have been destined for the upper river.hmmmmm Diferent story. Thats as much our river as anyone's.truely a loss
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#108651 - 02/27/01 11:12 PM
Re: 33 pounder
|
Fry
Registered: 02/25/01
Posts: 31
|
Originally posted by R Ridgeway: The Quinalts have 100% control of the lower river and I'm sure they wouldn't share it with you unless you're willing to pop for $100 a head......hunter (had to say it!). Can't really say they're putting fish in the river for sportfishers....wake up...it's for their back pocket. I'm all ears to hear of a tribe in Washington with a deep abiding love to preserve nates outside the Quinalts. I'm at a loss. On a separate note congrats go out to the 30 or so who punched a nate on the Quileute System over the weekend....never mind those fish that didn't get checked. Feel free to choke on your prized catch. A picture says a thousand words...what are you thinking! My God, if it's legal to keep nates in a particular, then that run isn't in danger. 30 fish will have almost zero impact on the run at all. Less than half of one percent. I'm all for the catch and release of natives, but if a person catches a trophy nate, in a river that's legal to keep them and he wants to mount a trophy, so be it. Give the guy a break. Now, a person who's filling out their punch card on nates is a different story. I'm talking about the people who keep 1 or 2 nates every few years.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#108652 - 02/28/01 01:03 PM
Re: 33 pounder
|
Juvenile at Sea
Registered: 03/28/00
Posts: 222
Loc: Renton,WA
|
Hey! wa fisher read the post again. 30 fish last weekend!!, 1 weekend of what 14 or so, you do the math!!. These #'s were in the seattle paper yesterday which only represent those who were checked and not all those who slipped by the checker and the poachers. And just because the flippin F&W says it's a healthy run doesn't mean squat. It might be healthy today, but with the state's head burried and increasing pressure, the OP rivers will be just like the puget sound rivers.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#108653 - 02/28/01 03:53 PM
Re: 33 pounder
|
Fry
Registered: 02/25/01
Posts: 31
|
Show me where there are 30+ nates taken every single weekend. If you want to C&R every single nate you catch, that's great, more power to you. But there's no need to harass the people who want to keep a trophy nate they catch. Again, read my earlier post, people who consistantly keep nates, and fill out their punch cards on nates are a different matter. But a person who catches a trophy nate and wants it mounted, that's great, more power to them.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
1123
Guests and
1
Spider online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
11499 Members
17 Forums
72945 Topics
825338 Posts
Max Online: 3937 @ 07/19/24 03:28 AM
|
|
|