First let me say that I am a little confused regarding the following statements made by Jim Bain in this thread.
Jim says “NSIA will be getting half of the proceeds, since I have never done this before I have no idea what the expenses will be.”
Jim says "...Honestly, some of the proceeds from this tournament will go to NSIA but the bulk will be retained by myself as I will be doing all of the work and absorbing all of the costs."
Jim says “In no way is this intended to start an organization, it is intended to make a tourney happen before the next board meeting of NSIA. However, to be honest, if they don't go for it I may pursue it.”
Jim says “All of this happening while NSIA earns nearly $500,000.00 in the process. We as sportsman would then finally have our first well funded lobbying organization...can you feel the winds of change??
Now, with that being said here is what I think are some high level views of the pros and cons.
Pros:
1) A well managed series of tournaments put on by a legitimate organization with the intent to help raise some funding for both the advocacy of the resource and the sport fisherman could be a good idea.
2) Some local business’s could get a much needed boost of income and exposure.
Cons:
1) Further commercialization for profit of and already strained resource is a bad idea.
2) Bad choices on tournament locations could bring some very negative exposure to the sport.
3) A poorly managed series of tournaments could result in even more negative exposure and possibly even prompt some lawsuits giving all sportsmen a bad reputation.
4) High risk for the abuse of the resource.
I have known Jim Bain for a number of years now and without going into details, I would have to say that given the confusing messages in this thread and also my lack of trust in this particular individual I could not support this idea. In my opinion this sounds like it is motivated purely for profit. I am not against making a buck, but I do believe that this resource is already over commercialized for profit and the potential for further abuse of the resource is to high. I don’t believe that for the most part, this would be in the best interest of salmon and sturgeon anglers. Especially if it is not done with a very high degree of professionalism, integrity and concern for both the resource and anglers in general.
I also think that this model being proposed could eliminate many anglers from participating. $200 basic entry fee and $40 for big fish tickets per boat is in my opinion to much. At 75 boats Jim stands to make a guaranteed $6000 from the basic entry fee alone. %100 of the Big fish tickets and any entry fees over the 75 boats will also go to Jim. The way I see it is BIG BUCKS to a private individual for a public resource. Also, all this is at little or no risk to Jim because if at least 75 boats do not enter then the tournament is cancelled with only a few days notice.
I would rather see the entry fees reduced to a reasonable amount and the show must go on. Rather than having a fixed payout for tournament, the payout should be a percentage of the entry fees with a percentage also going to cover expenses for time and material to put on the tournament.
Those are my thoughts
Correction: After re-reading the entry from, it is not clear how much the big fish payout will be. So it is unclear how much profit if any will be made from the big fish tickets sales.