Spawnout,
a little anti-sled, are we?
I'll certainly accept that there are some launch locations where power loading should be restricted, where the substrate is mud, for example. But for the most part, the substrate is river rock, and I haven't seen it getting moved around much at the ramps I use. Certainly any of the larger ramps on the larger rivers are developed enough to withstand the use and seem to do so.
If you think about where the force of the sled is exerted, it has to be more than 15 feet behind where the wheels of any trailer is going to be, let alone the truck that pulls it.
This is because, a) the trailer for a sled is at least 2 feet longer than a drift boat trailer, b) the motor is at least five feet behind the trailer wheel, c), the boat is about 16 inches off the ground when on the trailer, and c) the force of the jet comes out in a narrow stream that doesn't expand to 32 inches until 8 or 10 feet behind the boat.
So, any pothole you are seeing where it counts for you, isn't being caused by a jet boat. Sorry. I think the potholes are more likely to be caused by people spinning out as they pull out.
Maybe a better proposition might be to identify sites where powering on is specifically a problem, and restrict the use there. They do this at Hammond, for example.
I also wouldn't mind my trailer having a tax graduated to the size of my boat, and therefore to the impact of my use on the ramp. To the extent that I'm a heavier user, I'm pay. But conversely, since you use the ramp as well, you should pay, too. Bankies and other non-users shouldn't have to pay for the service we need.
Or should they? What do we think?
_________________________
Hm-m-m-m-m