http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Content...d=1142722231554


Interesting results....... check it out

So THAT'S where Rory came from.

We won't be hearing about this one on Fox "news."

I am confused now. It seemed to me they were describing you guys. LOL

I have never been a conformist. I have always made my own decisions, I am overflowing with self confidence, liberals whine till somethings given to them, and conservatives like to learn so they could do it themselves.

Liberals have a sense of entitlement. Conservatives dont complain about having to work for a living and dont expect anything for free.

conservatives fearfull? LMFAO
who was whining that we should leave the middle east alone so we dont piss them off more? LIBERALS hahahahahahahha The study is bogus.

The great Micro has spoken!!!! Thanks for helping me see the truth.

Microp, you're an exception to the rule.

But Karl Rove knows his constituency. Ever since 9-11 the Bu****es have been working at creating a climate of fear. And it worked for awhile.

if you think that liberals are whinning about leaving iraq so that we dont piss em of more-you are a conformist...... and the brave republicans want to stay because of their lack of fear.blah blah blah

liberals have a sense of entitlement etc....sorry micro but your post shows you completely conform to the republican and conservative talk radio talking points......

if you believe anythign you just wrote your beyond conformist....your a kool aid drinker

lupo, thats not what I said. I have heard liberals say over and over again that we shouldnt even be in the middle east (not just Iraq) because were just going to make more terrorist and more enemies. Lupo, your using typical liberal debate tactics. Responding with a response that sounds good to your buddies but really has nothing to do with what I said. Your avoiding admitting that the study really was biased and pertains to liberals. Your drinking the liberal koolaid so blindly your going to end up with diabetes.

also
Just yesterday I heard liberals complaining about big corperations making to much money and how they should give more of there money to people that dont have any. The guy was a true socialist in every sense of the definition hes on Am 1090. the thing that really irked me was he wouldnt say that the money was earned by the corperations just how greedily the horded it. My outlook on "greedy corperations" is that it is there money to do with as they see fit. They earned it. If there employees dont feel they are being payed enough then they are free to find better employment or start the own company! Heil marxist. lol. The study is really a bogus piece of dung and only conformist liberals would believe it was a sound study.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:

I found (the Jack Block study) to be biased, shoddy work, poor science at best'

Jeff Greenberg

University of Arizona

Micro...those Corps are given massive breaks out of your pocket...talk about Socialistic.

Ooobity boo. The liberals are ruining the country.

Yep. The study is sound.

Microp, do you see a corporation as a person? You obviously don't see a corporation as being the sum of the employees. Do you see a corporation as being like a person, with moral imperatives and moral rights and all?

From reading his posts and political opinions here... I think it's safe to say... that isn't all he's not aware of...

4 Salt - You gain the "NO [Bleeeeep!]" award for the day!! Good one.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`I found (the Jack Block study) to be biased, shoddy work, poor science at best'

Jeff Greenberg

University of Arizona

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


"I found it to be biased, shoddy work, poor science at best," he said of the Block study. He thinks insecure, defensive, rigid people can as easily gravitate to left-wing ideologies as right-wing ones. He suspects that in Communist China, those kinds of people would likely become fervid party members."

What the critic ends up saying in the last sentence is that the people that are right-wingers here would be fervid party members in Communist China.

That's an even bigger slam on right wingers than what Jack Block was saying!

"Microp, do you see a corporation as a person? You obviously don't see a corporation as being the sum of the employees. Do you see a corporation as being like a person, with moral imperatives and moral rights and all?"

A corporation is comprised of a group of people. pee-ons, upper pee-ons, supervisors , executives,and corporate officers.
Executives and Co's make the big bucks while the pee-ons have to work there way up the chain just as most of the higher ups did.If they dont have the skills or drive to better themselves they will fail and be a pee-on forever. Thats there decision. Thats the American way its your choice.

As far as those huge tax breaks and subsidies go. them people will [Bleeeeep!] more money in taxes then you will ever make. They put alot into the economy. Wealthy people pay a higher percentage of taxes already. without the wealthy your taxes would be much higher.

I have made the choice to have fun now. I dont have the desire to work my arse off and be rich though I do have the ability. Its just not me. You wont hear me whine about being ghetto poor or asking for handouts. Just so you know I am not saying these things because I am a rich corporate executive or something. I think ya'll got that impression already though didnt you.

"As far as those huge tax breaks and subsidies go. them people will [Bleeeeep!] more money in taxes then you will ever make. They put alot into the economy. Wealthy people pay a higher percentage of taxes already. without the wealthy your taxes would be much higher."

1. if you can prove that you will be the richest economist in history
2.you are also placing great value in "economic growth" when the value should be placed on "economic strength"

consider the flooowing allegory of your statement:
so if a rich guy has a 100 dollars and instead of taxing him $20 he gets a tax break and is only taxed $10.......so your saying he has an extra $10 to spend and make the economy "grow". so he buys a boat for $9 bucks and spends $1 on sales tax....
the boat maker that sold the boat made 3 dollars on the boat and pays $1 in taxes on it.......

so you have given back ten dollars in tax breaks and thru trickle down you have gotten back two dollars.

you guys that spew this theory have never thought it thru......the rich dont take their money and go and build factories that employ americans that can then go and spend......they build factories in CHINA

Micro, in the eyes of the law a Corp is a living breathing entity and is treated like a person when it's to it's advantage and vice versa when it's to it's advantage. Most major Corps pay zero tax. ZERO. So your theory should be the opposite....if the wealthy paid taxes like the rest of us our taxes would be much lower.

so your a 1090 listener stlHead. your statement is so full of BS. if that was true Why are they moving over seas its not Just cheeper labor either why did boeing move to Texas the taxes were killing them.