Ha Ha

I laughed about it all day !

I have discovered a new crisis, story and photos tomorrow.........stay tuned !

I can't wait....?

Too funny aunty

With all the life experiance I keep hearing about floating around in this forum, you should expect routine delays by now, will try to get pics tomorrow.

I try to reply to folks around here with their proper screen name, I feel it helps to maintain some semblance of civility, I slip up sometimes and return fire when someone calls me a name, but what do you think about trying to be polite.....if wrong ?

I guess you are right, I get called a neo-con often enough to not think you were being nice...

I had to look up neo-con on GOOGLE, I found the definition to be basicly "new conservative", I expected the definition to be worse than that, same thing with "bigot", definition isn't as bad as most of the people tossing the word around want it to be..............the best part is that I don't really fit either description, but how would the name callers know enough about a guy to staple a name to his forhead after only a brief chat online anyway...........

Then how can calling someone a bigot replace one whole side of a debate ?

See, right there I am shocked that you would say that, either you are just trying to be funny, or you have a very bad picture of me painted in your mind.

I do believe that every person should have the same rights, and I do believe that given equal rights different people will live different lives, I believe in helping people, and I believe helping people should be voluntary, I believe some people will be gay, and I don't think any rights should be taken away nor made specially for them.

I love and respect women, I have even heard of a few of them with brains <wink>, where someone was born or what color their skin is of no consequence to me...'specially since I was born in a stolen Country and my skin changes color depending upon the weather !

The definition I found didn't mention religion or race........the definition you found makes it a stonger and more negative word....

You are wrong to say that I painted the picture in your mind, interpretation is everything, and putting whatever spin helps your side of a debate on every word the other person says has a pronounced effect on the picture in your mind...I think being competitive in these debates makes it almost necessary to think of the other person as the "bad guy", I probably have even done it myself <wink>.

"Yes. It seems to describe just about every single one of us, doesn't it?"

I can almost agree with that. I definately have my fair share of intolerance, but I think many people on this board who have hate issues (including me) are irritated by those who use race or religion or politics to harm others. For instance, at first glance, if you were to meet me on the street, I fit your average WASP profile, and for the most part it's true. However, I hate (keyword) the way some Christians believe they have the right to punish because they feel superior. I hate racism, I'm sure I sound like a racist at times, I really only say it to get under other peoples skin because I know it bothers them. I don't hate musl;ims or hindus or jews and think they all should be able to practice however they want as long as they don't hurt anyone else. I don't hate republicans, my father is one, I dp hate republicans that want to opress the poor and eliminate the middle class, there are plenty of dems I hate as well, Hilary and dean, just to start, don't like kerry much either. So what it really boils down to, is that yes, we all hate, but hate for exlusion of others based solely on race, religion, creed, political affiliation or gender is wrong, always will be, and that is truly bigotry.

Sorry to hear fishing was poor, I'll save my gas money this weekend, thanks for the update. I am jealous you got to spend your day on a boat with a couple of true heroes though.

Good Lord, I guess if someone says the sun rises in the East, and can't be swayed otherwise, he is a bigot ?

Maybe your real definition of a bigot is anyone who doesn't think what you want them to think...

I do not think all women have to stay home regardless of financial need.

I have repeatedly clarified for you that I specificly think there are a LOT of women working w/ kids in daycare who don't need the money, they may have to rid themselves of a few luxury items to make it, but the quality of a kids life is worth just about any sacrafice in the material world.

If we can't agree on that, then why are we even talking ?

Here's a cherry to put on top...

In a PERFECT WORLD every parent would hold their offsprings wellbeing right up there with their own survival.

"In a PERFECT WORLD every parent would hold their offsprings wellbeing right up there with their own survival. "

Almost, in a perfect world, there would never be a concern as to where your next meal would come from, thus allowing people to raise their children according to the commandments brought forth by Org.

"Good Lord, I guess if someone says the sun rises in the East, and can't be swayed otherwise, he is a bigot"

No...just someone who doesn't confuse facts and opinion.

AuntyM, My vote weighs the exact same as yours......

Go be mad at the meth cooks and rapists, I'm not your enemy...

Alright AuntM...

The wife is booting me for a while so she can upload some pictures...you know women !

When I get back on here please have a list of my faults outlined, I will read with an open mind, but I will definately not lay down and accept if you twist my words and spin them to try and make me into the devil.....he is in jail in Iraq thanks to W.............


<I crack me up !>

I'm going to watch Capote, ha ha ha HAHA

Final score-- Aunty: 2 Org: you're in the red

I like the way you guys wiggle, nicely done...

Oregonian: Glad to see you keep posting. Things would get awful dull around here without someone stiring the pot. You are the best thing we have had since TK.

Org's full of it, his biggest crisis is trying to put M&M's in alphebetical irder