#208912 - 09/01/03 10:19 AM
Re: Is WT For or Against Fishing?
|
Spawner
Registered: 04/04/00
Posts: 749
Loc: LAKEWOOD,WA,USA
|
I thought that when Ramon was posting on the board the last time he made it pretty clear the WT was not in favor of fishing.
_________________________
Everyone's superman behind the keyboard
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#208913 - 09/01/03 11:19 AM
Re: Is WT For or Against Fishing?
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 11/19/02
Posts: 367
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
I'm not speaking for WT, but I believe I know enough about them to say this much.
They are not a fishing or fisherman led orginization and as such will not take a position for or against fishing because that is not their concern. They are for proper management of our ocean bound fisheries, but whether that involves fishing or not is inconsequencial. So if it came down to wild fish vs. fishing, they would choose the wild fish.
_________________________
"If fishing is like religion, then flyfishing is high church." -Tom Brokaw
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#208915 - 09/01/03 11:31 AM
Re: Is WT For or Against Fishing?
|
Reverend Tarpones
Registered: 10/09/02
Posts: 8379
Loc: West Duvall
|
I think CWU girl has it right. WT is for fish, which should, in the long run, help fishermen. Sounds right to me. If fighting for proper managment and protection of fish is wrong, I don't want to be right. I am one fishermen who beleives WT is looking out for my long term interests. Thank you WT.
_________________________
No huevos no pollo.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#208917 - 09/01/03 11:43 AM
Re: Is WT For or Against Fishing?
|
Juvenille at Sea
Registered: 07/12/02
Posts: 150
Loc: Issaquah
|
You would be hard pressed to believe that WT does not have membership that includes thefisherman or woman. By the postings on this topic, many either are, or could be. I don't think this is an "absolute" agenda, such as PETA, that draws a line between the sportsman and the environmentalist. This is a lot more gray.
_________________________
Pass Me a Beer
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#208918 - 09/01/03 12:14 PM
Re: Is WT For or Against Fishing?
|
It all boils down to this - I'm right, everyone else is wrong, and anyone who disputes this is clearly a dumbfuck.
Registered: 03/07/99
Posts: 16958
Loc: SE Olympia, WA
|
animal rights type organization.
You mean like PETA? I doubt WT will be unveiling their "Fishing Hurts" campaign any time soon. I'd say they're proponents of wild fish recovery, and their organization puts that as priority one.
_________________________
She was standin' alone over by the juke box, like she'd something to sell. I said "baby, what's the goin' price?" She told me to go to hell.
Bon Scott - Shot Down in Flames
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#208919 - 09/01/03 12:58 PM
Re: Is WT For or Against Fishing?
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 11/19/02
Posts: 367
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
I don't believe that WT is an animal rights orginization- however, their position on the trapping initiative doesn't do much to disspell any AR rumors. IMO, they shouldn't even have a position on it.
Anyway, there is a big difference between animal rights activists and environmentalists. An environmentalist is interested in the big picture, with preserving and enhancing the environment. An animal rights orginization is interested in preservation of individual animals, along with their overall welfare. They aren't concerned with the species so much, or the big picture. An environmentalist can see that management through fishing/hunting does work in many cases, whereas an AR activist can't see any benefit to killing any animals (usually).
I think many (won't go so far as most) fishermen and hunters are in some respects environmentalist or atleast interested in conversation. Personally, I'm far more concerned with the enhancement of wild fisheries than I am with preserving sport fisheries.
_________________________
"If fishing is like religion, then flyfishing is high church." -Tom Brokaw
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#208921 - 09/01/03 02:33 PM
Re: Is WT For or Against Fishing?
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Originally posted by grandpa2: I think it was Rob Allen who was defending WT by saying they were mostly fishermen and so on....Like I said I don't think WT says that themselves. look at the washington trout website and look at the sponsers of there last auction, if they were not into sportsfishing why would they give out trips with guides and sportsfishing gear for prizes ?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#208922 - 09/01/03 04:18 PM
Re: Is WT For or Against Fishing?
|
Three Time Spawner
Registered: 06/14/00
Posts: 1828
Loc: Toledo, Washington
|
Boater said; " look at the washington trout website and look at the sponsers of there last auction, if they were not into sportsfishing why would they give out trips with guides and sportsfishing gear for prizes ?" Answer; for $$$$$$ to keep them going! Sometimes big time drug dealer sell lots of dope but they never touch the stuff themselves! Now why would they do that? Answer; for $$$$$$ to keep them going! WT are not dugs dealers, but they do like their money and they will sell whatever it takes to make that money (that encludes fishing tackle and guided trips). Actually they are pretty smart. They are using the sport fishers own time and money to make them enough money to close down sport fishing. Not a bad idea from a business point of view. Attacking WT will only make them madder and dig in even deeper. A wise person would make there attacks on the business that are supporting this group! Without funding, WT would surly dry up like every other organization does. They may exist, but without funding will be powerless. I always wonder where WT was when the Cowlitz was being relicensed, especially since the Cowlitz has the largest hatcheries in state. Apparently they did not want to "take on the public" or pi$$ off thousands on sport fishers, the commercial gill netters, or maybe they were afraid of the power and money that Tacoma Power (the owners of the states largest hatcheries) has. But like they say, sometimes it's a lot easier to bring in a bunch of "little fish" compared to bringing in the biggest one out there! Cowlitzfisherman
_________________________
Cowlitzfisherman
Is the taste of the bait worth the sting of the hook????
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#208923 - 09/01/03 08:00 PM
Re: Is WT For or Against Fishing?
|
Reverend Tarpones
Registered: 10/09/02
Posts: 8379
Loc: West Duvall
|
Two things should be apparent to any who are willing to look. WT is for wild fish, not necessarilky fishermen. Many, if not all WT members are fishermen. The two are not mutually exclusive. I know for a fact that Ramon is an avid fisherman. But I suspect he would be willing to forgo some fishing opportunities to help the wild fish. As would I.
_________________________
No huevos no pollo.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#208925 - 09/01/03 08:54 PM
Re: Is WT For or Against Fishing?
|
Reverend Tarpones
Registered: 10/09/02
Posts: 8379
Loc: West Duvall
|
Thanks Grandpa: I will try to frequent those fine folks whenever possible. It's great to see so many local companies willing to donate to help our wild fish.
_________________________
No huevos no pollo.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#208929 - 09/01/03 10:02 PM
Re: Is WT For or Against Fishing?
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 11/19/02
Posts: 367
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
Hmmm... is it that only fly fishing related companies were asked or fly fishing companies are more concerned with conservation? Rheortical question.. don't answer that..
I've yet to see where WT has acted to enhance fly fishing opportunities or taken it upon themselves to pick on other methods of fishing. They seem to pick battles that they feel will benefit WILD FISH, period. Maybe that's because they're not a fishing organization. So, when is this super secret "wine sipping elitist yuppie" agenda going to rear its ugly head?
Just because they're not sportsman show lovin' trailer trash, doesn't mean they're wrong. (used name calling only to get across that the extreme generalizations used about WT members are just as silly).
_________________________
"If fishing is like religion, then flyfishing is high church." -Tom Brokaw
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#208930 - 09/01/03 10:04 PM
Re: Is WT For or Against Fishing?
|
Reverend Tarpones
Registered: 10/09/02
Posts: 8379
Loc: West Duvall
|
Aunty M:
You must have a crystal ball! I do donate directly to WT every year. I was thinking of cutting back as I am now retired and need to watch my pennies a bit more than I used to. But I see they need the money more than ever now, so I guess I will have to continue to help them out. Still, if I'm going to make a purchase of something one of their supporters provides I miight as well give them the business to show that I appreciate thier efforts.
_________________________
No huevos no pollo.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
564
Guests and
15
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
11499 Members
17 Forums
72942 Topics
825233 Posts
Max Online: 3937 @ 07/19/24 03:28 AM
|
|
|