Well I guess you have to redefine seared now.

I know libs like to be bent over but tis guy is really going for the gold!

Support The DrudgeReport; Visit Our Advertisers XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX THU AUG 12, 2004 21:01:21 ET XXXXX

JANUARY -- NOT CHRISTMAS -- KERRY IN CAMBODIA

**Exclusive**

TOUR OF DUTY author and John Kerry historian Doug Brinkley is rushing a piece for the NEW YORKER: to set-the-record-straight on Kerry's Christmas in Cambodia tale, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

Kerry has turned to author Brinkley for a "modification" after it was exposed that Kerry was not in Cambodia during Christmas of 1968, as he once claimed from the Senate floor.

The Brinkley piece for the NEW YORKER will now say that Kerry was not in Cambodia during Christmas, but rather in January, publishing sources tell DRUDGE.

MORE

Since the early 1970s, Kerry has spoken and written of how he was illegally ordered to enter Cambodia. Kerry mentioned it in the floor of the Senate in 1986 when he charged that President Reagan’s actions in Central America were leading the U.S. in another Vietnam. Here’s what he said as excerpted from the new book, UNFIT FOR COMMAND:

"I remember Christmas of 1968 sitting on a gunboat in Cambodia. I remember what it was like to be shot at by the Vietnamese and Khmer Rouge and Cambodians, and have the president of the United States telling the American people that I was not there; the troops were not in Cambodia. I have that memory which is seared--seared--in me."

John O’Neil’s, author of UNFIT FOR COMMAND, comments on the “clarification:”

“John Kerry describes Christmas Eve in Cambodia as a critical turning point in his life. We now know that his story is completely false. My question is how many people do you know have invented a turning point, one that is seared in his memory? While it makes sense for John Kerry to come clean about the Cambodia story, it is one of several tales that the Kerry campaign will have to face and clarify.”

“By claiming we were engaged in a war crime and crossing international borders, John Kerry damaged the credibility of all the commanding officers above him and insulted the sailors who served with him,” said John O’Neill, member of Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.”

Developing...

Still doesn't change the fact that he volunteered for combat duty, now does it?

Gawd, that's gotta drive the GOP nuts.

You know, it's only the Fudge Report so you really don't need to post it in every (Dick Cheney) thread. :rolleyes:

GH,

Should I post all the volunteer vets that have comitted horrendous murders and crimes so you can give them their props. What really gets the libs is admitting that one good deed does not cancel out a history of lies.

Seems now that the searing really effected him. He was transported forward in time 4 years.


This from Andrew Antippos in this morning's Washington Times:

-----------------------------------------

"Finally, concerning the assertion that Mr. Kerry was shot at by the Khmer Rouge during his Christmas 1968 visit to Cambodia, it should be noted that the Khmer Rouge didn't take the field until the Easter Offensive of 1972, when the Vietnamese forces that had attacked the Cambodians initially in March 1970 pulled out of Cambodia to attack the U.S. and Vietnamese forces in Vietnam. Only Vietnamese Communist soldiers were found on the battlefields of Cambodia in 1970-72."

-----------------------------------------

"Still doesn't change the fact that he volunteered for combat duty"

You can keep spouting that all you like, but it must drive the libs nuts knowing he did it just to save face. He was about to be drafted and knew it would look better if he convinced them to call his impending draft a 'volunteer' action. They didn't care what it was called - they just made sure he went.

It's like having your house surrounded by the FBI, then coming out with your hands up and saying they should give you a break for coming voluntarily. They would have gotten you either way...

The straw you're grasping at is STILL out of reach.

Keep reaching.

Phreak,

You can make as much sense as you want it's not about the facts or logic it's about hate. They hate Bush and would vote for anyone other than him. Primarily beacuse he is overtly Christian.

Typical GOP BS, start playing the religion card. When you have nothing tangible, cry and claim some sort of discrimination. :rolleyes:

PP - Yep, he volunteered to do the right thing instead of waiting to be told. Pretty honorable trait. One more reason he has more class than the incumbent.

------------------------------------------------------------

Of those who regularly attend religious services and say that their faith plays an important role in their life---President Bush has a considerable lead over Kerry.

Ooooooh. That's a REALLY big lie. What are you trying to do........keep up with the candidates?

Dans,

On the whole it's not a lie. Maybe in your case but that would be the exception and we know exceptions cannot be made into the rule. To be fair I think it would be true if Bush proposed legislation based on any religous values such as Muslim, Hindu etc. In this area of the country secifically people are very opposed to Christian values . What is really funny is for the least church attending area in the nation that when polled this area holds one of the highest percentage of people that claim to be spiritual. They just make it up as they go along as long as it fells good.

I know plenty of enlightened Christians who are not voting for Bush.

game point the left wins again :p

For crying out loud!

If Kerry hadn't brought up his service record, no one would be talking about it. The facts are that he lied about most of it and embellished on the rest.

Check out the facts.

C'mon you yellow dog democrats, try THINKING for a change! It just might feel good!

If Kerry is the best that the democrats can do, then maybe a yellow dog would be better!

I think, therefore I'm conservative.

If you are 20 and not liberal, you don't have a heart. If you are 40 and liberal, you don't have a brain.

I saw a bumper sticker a while back. It read:

THE DAY WILL COME WHEN LIBERALS WIL L BE HUNTED WITH DOGS.

Can't say as I wholly disagree with the sentiment.

I like that...maybe traps would be legal too...and baiting...liberals go for the bait really easy...like bears to a pile of donuts.

Oh you mean thinking like our Commander and Chief.....NO THANKS.....the boy has obviously had a lobotomy at one time.

Rebuplicans are the Anencephalic Eunuchs of todays society.

Ah, yes..............the old "do as I say, not as I do" thing, huh?

Hey Hog King, have you been listening to George Will lately. He's as conservative as they come and doesn't have too many nice things to say about GWB these days. Are you going to accuse him too of being a "yellow dog" and unable to think?

"In this area of the country s[p]ecifically people are very opposed to Christian values ."

That's a tremendous load of crap. Values like faith (religious and otherwise), charity, honesty, humility, and compassion are just as important here as they are anywhere else in the world...perhaps even moreso than in many places in the country.

My out-of-state friends are always impressed by the overall "niceness" of people around here.

What people around here are opposed to, though, is a pious, hypocritical, environmental disaster who does it all in the name of his "Christian" values, while devaluing every Christian and Christian value along the way.

I don't find "Hey! I may be a disaster in lots of ways, and all my daddy's buds are getting absolutely loaded off of tax dollars that are buying all kinds of war machine components from them...but I'm a Christian....so you should vote for me" to be much of a campaign platform.

If you buy that one, I've got some beachfront property in Nevada to show you...

Fish on...

Todd

Are you liberals incapable of non-linear thinking?

This thread was not started to espouse the character of the sitting president. No, this thread was started to point out the inconsistencies of public statements put forth by a contender for the presidency of these United States!

There has not been a single one of you supportes of Kerry for President, that have addressed a single one of his lies about his record in Viet Nam.

As is typical with those of the liberal persuasion, you attack the messenger rather than the message.

How many of you Kerry supporters honestly believe in Kerry's honesty and integrity based on what has been going on?

No, I didn't ask for a rabid attack of GWB, but rather an honest appraisal of the democrat nominee for the presidency.

How many of you Kerry supporters honestly believe that John Kerry is a supporter of yours and mine right to keep and bear arms? Oh sure, the guy can shoot skeet, but then so do a lot of the super elite rich!

God Save the Republic of these United States!

"As is typical with those of the liberal persuasion, you attack the messenger rather than the message."

And as is typical of the neocons, you attack your detractors for doing something that you yourself are doing, have been doing, and likely have been doing it to an even greater extent than that which you are decrying.

Fish on...

Todd

What a great quote :rolleyes: Stereotyping huh. Isn't that a little hypocritical?


I guess I just don't understand why people make statements like that? Really shows their ignorance. If someone is on the other side of the isle they are a baboon? Then again you are probably a 14yo posting crap on here with the rest of your 'gang'.

What a dumb a$$. :rolleyes:

Try spell check Socrates

Well then, maybe you'd like to answer that SAME question about GWB, oh Master of Irony.

Face it, it's a battle of losers. Pick your loser, vote, and your job is done. (You can hold your nose if you need to)

Todd:

Hey Man, make some sense, will ya?

I gotta tell you man, that was a pretty lame response to some legitimate questions.

You still haven't addressed the issues raised by the initiator of this thread. You are still going after the messenger, not the message.

It was Samuel Clements that said "Never argue with a fool. It is hard for onlookers to tell the difference!" See ya!

Hoooo Boy...!!!!!

Oh yeah Todd, what's a neocon?

FinBonk

Like I said

As Monty Python would say, "Run away! Run away!"

If you peruse this forum in depth you'll find that the classic Elvis cut-n-paste (CNP) entry above was performed in about four different threads. Matter of fact, even Krusty has done a CNP of it as well. It has been addressed, refuted, and debunked elsewhere. I'd give you a link, but that would give you reason not to enjoy the entire forum now, wouldn't it?

By the way, boys and girls, consider ...

Hog King... TheKing... hmmmmm....

Oh, wait. No grammatical or spelling errors. Can't be. (Dick Cheney)

------------------------------------------------------------
Hog King,

The far left used to call those who believe in the strong unwaivering support of Israel and their right to exist as a Jewish state 'Zionists'.

Once the general public caught on to the' wink-wink' anti-semitic sentiment in that charactarization, they changed the label from Zionist to Neo-conservative or neo-con.

Once the general public catches on to the'wink-wink' Neo-conservative term--they'll change it to something else.

I was East of the mountains for the past 10 days never saw a Kerry for President sign the whole time. It was nice going into small towns and seeing all GOP candidates running for local office.

The question remains. Kerry has been caught in a multitude of lies. Like he you libs continue to shift ,side step into as hominem attacks on GW or anyone else. Kerrys actions are the question here no one elses. Everyday more and more lies are being exposed and it make no difference to dispicable liberals.

Todd,

BTW I have people from all over the country visit as well. They report that Seattle is the most provincal and cliquish area of the US. Internet dating sites support the thought that Seattle is a garage door society. Where people come and go from their cliques to their homes and few know their neighbors.