"normal operations of a building" that also happen to provide perfectly legitimate answers to the question you posed.

Conveniently, none of these security tapes that should have been recording during a 'power down' have ever surfaced. Missing evidence.... AGAIN .

I wonder where Securacom's on-site offices were.....wtc7 perhaps?

I have a difficult time understanding how anyone could find out that Bouche's brother owned the company in charge of security for THE WTC, UAL and DULLES...the buildings, the airline AND the airport involved in this tragedy...and not come away at least concerned enough to keep digging.

You havn't answered a single question... How is a team of engineers is going to have enough time to plant enough explosives to bring down a building the size of the WTC in a single weekend... Add to that the power was turned off and they had no way to run hammer drills or saws-alls...

Go back and re-read the article you posted... it has nothing to do with surveillance of the building maintancence crews to see if they were planting explosives...



your evidence is circumstancial at best and pretty thin at that...

All we are left with is circumstances because, against federal guidelines for crime scene investigation, the evidence has been removed, destroyed and more suspiciously, gone missing.

My pile of circumstantial evidence dwarves that of the 'official story'.

Securacom owned by Bouche's. Rolling blackouts and evacuations in the WEEKS preceding the tragedy. Potential access through the elevator shafts. Eyewitness testimony. Video evidence. Forensic evidence....this is all a potential answer to the question of 'How could they...", even if you find it unpalatable. You have to admit that a Bush family member owning and being the president of the company who handled security for UAL, WTC and DIA at the time of the tragedy is remarkably coincidental at the least. Worthy of further investigation even. The 9/11 commission investigation gave you a computer animation and a pat on the fanny.

****

It's remarkable to note that no one wants to talk about nanothermite anymore, or really ever did in the first place I guess.

In Dutch w/subtitles...

1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5_uoFNfJqw

2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=838ygMyEnSo&feature=related

3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYqjhfCVftI&feature=related

the truth is bludgeoning you

so far in this thread no one has brought forth an alternative explanation as to how weapons grade nanothermite wound up in the wtc debris.

when asked 'how could they....?' I provide scenarios backed by evidence and instead of a rebuttals I get attacks.

lots of people attacking me, but not the evidence.

judging by the content of this board recently it would be easiest to chalk this up to pure stupidity but I know better....

....the rest of you are just plain chicken to have a REAL debate on this subject.

Intellectual pussies, to wo/man

Yes, that's right I'm resorting to namecalling. Much like the Professor calling McFly a chicken to spur him to action. If you poked your head in here to make fun, you are a pussy. If you failed to educate yourself on the subjects arising from the presentation of this evidence, you are a pussy.

Consider that my 'counter-attack'.

Here's your chance to redeem yourself. See if you can attack my position without attacking me. See if you can contribute to the conversation without heckling from the peanut gallery. See if you can keep your emotions in check long enough to apply critical thinking skills to this discussion.

Truly, I have my doubts. I have the over/under on number of replies it takes to receive an attack at 2......any takers on the over?

i dont even know what the hell you are talking about.....

Nope.

There goes the 2nd post.....

Could some of the hijackers have been carrying some explosives on them?

oh....this is about the wtc.....jerry, that would be too logical, im sure our government planned on killing our own citizens, because that would make more sense.....