Booing is old hat, and not sensational enough for 2009.

If one of those doctors would have thrown his shoe at Obama, it wouldn't have been edited out.

"Stlhead, did you listen to the speach??? Didn't think so. Did you watch MSN last night and notice that they edited out the boos? Didn't think so. Either get the facts or STFU!"

Hey you typical republican knuckle head. Point out your hypocrisy and you go ape [censored]. I did listen to the speech and on NBC the boos were not edited out. I have the facts. The are you offered your own little warped commentary then claimed you didn't. I called you on your BS and you start frothing. Can't stand the heat then git.

For the third time I'll point out that the CSNS attorney and the AG from Sacramento are both Republicans, and that the AG was appointed by GWB...and they are the ones saying that the IG went way to far in this case, and didn't have the facts to back up his allegations?

Hard to pin that on the left, or anyone else...except the guy who overstepped his bounds and may have made a special task for himself of going after someone intending to make it into some sort of a political stink.

Fish on...

Todd

Sorry Stlhead I don't suffer fools well.

Warped commentary??? Please tell me where I was factually incorrect?

If there wasn't any merit to his case, WHY did they give most of the money back? Oh some of that money came directly from KJ's bank account

As I said above, those folks all serve at the President's pleasure, and though they can't be fired for political reasons, they can be fired for most anything else, including "lack of confidence" in them by their boss...and when the attorney in Walpin's very own organization says he's going too far, and the AG in charge says he's going to far and can't back up his allegations, it starts to look more like Walpin's the one going after someone for political reasons...and that will get you fired.

Fish on...

Todd

Doobie on vacation or somethin?

Looks like rabbit chasin' time... complete with tin foil hat.

You're drunk again. If you believe firing the AGs and firing the IG are ethically equivalent, you haven't a clue what ethics are. Doesn't suprise me though since you seem to have some 12 year old writing your ad hominem attacks for you.

But just to play along, I'd rather have the problem of constipation of the digestive track rather than your diarreah of the mouth and constipation of the mind.

Wow O's got all the wingnuts twisting in the wind, the real question is, can he keep it up for another 91 months?

You are making a pretty big assumption.

With enough campaign donations from the pharmaceutical companies (pfizer) he should be able to. Problem is seeing the Dr. every 4 hours for a de-stimuli dose.

You know KK I definitely have my moments where I am foolish, and I suffer for it. Like when I thought that at least some of you left wingers would show a little intellectual honesty, and admit that Obama playing the same game as Bush is wrong. But hey it is probably Bush's fault anyway.

Not even in the same league as BushCorp's activities...and that's being intellectually honest, unlike you and "centrist" AuntyM...

Fish on...

Todd

Look on the bright side, with the eco terrorists no longer in power now we don't have to read about the daily casualties from the "War on the Environment".

"It's the habitat stupid"

All that Ginkgo made you sharp as a tack.

I voted for Obama. I read Todd's posts regarding the charges, counter-charges, serving at the prez' pleasure, etc. There's not enough information to know if there were truly legitimate reasons (lack of confidence having the potential of being real or being duplicitous). I think Obama should not have canned Walpin for the simple reason that it very easily appears to be a politically motivated firing, and he should have avoided that. There are other alternatives.

Sg

I agree...too bad he didn't consult with us beforehand!

Fish on...

Todd

Riding this horse until it drops......come on Gov. jobs and tax $.

Mf