GM made a $4.7 Billion profit after the Democrats bailed them out, against the republican's wishes.

Goldman Sachs reports that the republican's latest attempt at budget cutting, against the Democrat's wishes, will also cut GDP by 2%.

Who are the pro-business guys, again?

Naw, we would have been better off without GM and WTF does Goldman Sachs know about money? Right Hank. Come on and regurgitate the talking points.

Go back to your google and do some more research on just how supportive the republicans were of bush's approval of the Democrat's bill. Not very. So GM's future might be tough. It's business, right? And GM is still in business, thousands of people are still employed, and the American economy is better for it.

And then a cut-n-paste by J.D. Foster and the National Review? Really? There's some objective journalism for ya.

From his profile: Foster served at the Treasury Department, where he was Senior Adviser in Economics at the department's Office of Tax Policy. He also advised the Assistant Secretary on issues concerning the 2001 tax cut, the 2002 tax stimulus bill, reform of the tax expenditure presentation in the President's budget, simplification, and options for tax reform.

Yeah, senior advisor of economics for bush's fiscal policies. And how'd that all work out for ya?

And now Goldman Sachs is really just a front for an uber left wing organization?

And they've gave more to republicans in 2010. So now they're a front for an uber right wing organization, right?

Solid work.

Which is precisely why all elections should be publically funded.

But this all takes away from the original point of this thread: to sarcastically point out the fallacy of wingnuts' loyalty to party brand.

Obviously, sarcasm is lost on Chuck.

Remember when I told you guys that they are all assholes........?