Whats with the guy who has the biggest circles under his eyes of any of his comrades? The inability to see the benefits of taxing the rich, or the refusal to extend the payroll tax deduction for 2 more months. I would think extending it for two months is better than nothing. All of a sudden he decides extending it for two months is not as great as a year. WTF is he thinking, I am surprised he wants it extended for a year let alone at all, two months should be a good compromise given his background.

He's another one that needs to go. His name fits him.

WTF are you thinking, as far as I can remember it's been the GOP kickin the can down the road. So when Mr. Bohner decides he wants a year long extension it seems like news to me. I can't remember a time when they haven't kicked the can down the road.

It's about time to make the GOP members feel like the minorities they really are.

So... how would you suggest we "reform entitlements" Hank?

Besides of course letting less fortunate senior citizens die in abject poverty without any healthcare coverage.

See that right there is the problem Hank, we didn't get in this deficit hole because of entitlements, we got here because people with all the money aren't paying enough in taxes.
Why the fux would you want to cut entitlements?

We got here with some high dollar wars, cuts in taxes to the rich, and dependence on foreign oil. Now we got deadbeat Mr. John Bohner thinking he can rule the roost because he doesn't need to pay his share. Like what part about over spending under earning don't you understand.

The theory that Republicans think they should be allowed to pay off the deficit they created by cutting entitelements is purely an excuse. I never knew they were dirt bags till they came up with that idea.

The GOP really think they're large and in charge because they drove the country in the ground and now all they can do is gloat about it. Can't wait till it's their turn "BATTER UP".

It wasn't that long ago when the liberals, pushing Obama-care, were in favor of denying benefits to those they now defend.

Is that the case today?

Big Wall Street, Big Business, Big Deficits, Big Republicans, it all makes sense.

Politically stupid for the R's but correct and I can not believe I typed that. Truth is the companies that do major pay roll nation wide have said at least 90 days to update soft ware. In other words two months then do it again does make a mess and some companies will not even make the adjustment in two months.

The President was correct when he said it needed to be for a year then politics took over D's reversed and R's took the leap. This is about the House vs the Senate as much as R vs D, add election year and we have the toxic brew. Reverse the positions and this would still happen as the Senate and House relations have continued to deteriorate even when the D's controlled both.

Boob tube info and sound bites logic are the rule as it is the Christmas Season!

Robbing Paul to pay Peter's debts is just plain wrong.

Deep down I'm sure it is.....ya'll are just too chickenchit to admit it with your "hope and change homey" on the line. No doubt his second term'll be a phvcking doosey.

You want us to believe that you dipchits 'have seen the light'? gmafb That you're now magnanimous enough to extend benefits to the elderly, to cancer patients terminal and non-terminal, children with severe retardation? Laughable....you were wrong before and you're still wrong.

But you can count on Peters' support!

[/quote]The GOP will make them eat quarter rations of cat food and starve them before they need healthcare. It will be over for them before they get to that point anyway. That GOp will be polluting the rivers and making little kids drink mercury and eat lead paint chips. They'll be shipping all of the jobs to India too. You're gonna have to duke it out with a Mexican in order to cut lawns or paint the houses of the 1%.[/quote]

Well it's finally clear that Hank has a complete understanding of the GOP platform that he so ardently supports.

Why didn't Hank make it past 1st grade? He became a Republican.

"Finish up your Cocoa Puffs and give it another shot." Sounds like someone's been hangin around Mr. Bohner too long.

You told him. lol

Hank, if I didn't know any better I would say you and Bohner are related, are you?

RvW, Sarah Palin, and four retarded TeaBaggers in Florida...the only six people in the entire country that believe in the Death Panels.

Fish on...

Todd

Anybody can claim to be a tea party member, but if all he received is 4% of the vote it would appear most thought he was a flake.

"According to the New York Daily News, Manson, who lost his 2011 bid for a City Council seat in Carson, Calif. with only 4 percent of the vote"



Not sure how a Ron Paul supporter becomes a tea party candidate

"Manson, an avid Ron Paul supporter and libertarian"

It would be nice to know that our politicians get drug tested.

If there was ever a reason to give the President the line item veto - this is it. Congress (both D's and R's) have not covered themselves in glory on this one. No wonder they have a 9% approval rate. This is how I remember this whole mess coming down.

1. The House passes a one-year payroll tax cut extension along with the Unemployment Benefits package. BTW - they also include monies authorizing the Canadian oil pipeline.

2. This bill is sent over to the Senate. Obama will veto the bill if passed, he wants more study on the pipeline. The Senate can not figure out a way to pass the bill with the pipeline money and reach the desired effect. The Senate negotiates a two month extension, Unemployment Benefits, no pipeline (it passes 89-10, widespread D and R support) and sends it back to the House.

3. The House votes to not consider the Senate bill.

The Republican talking point is that the Dems want ONLY a 2 month extension and that is unworkable. The Democrat talking point is that the R's have raised taxes. And all of this with something that the two parties agree to. Both parties want a one year extension. Is this a classic definition of dysfunction? A pox on both their houses!

Damn, if you impoverish the 'rich' and stripped them of every penny how long do you suppose the Feds would need to spend it.?
I don't believe the 'rich' have enought assets combined to take this
government out of debt.
It's the spending habits not the income.

btw, start with Soros.

The "Feds" ARE the rich you dolt.

We might wan't to think about drug testing Biden after yeserday's remarks on the Taliban.

He cries because even his own party won't listen to him.
Add in having supporters like Illyrian most people would probably shoot themselves.

Help yourself.