i get what your saying... not all zoogles are boogles, meaning or in this case, not all young black teeneagers, or even black men in general, are like the others that kill, mame, and hurt.. same with whites, asians, mexicans, cougars, bears, and pigmy goats... its called stereotyping, or "profiling" a person based of his skin color..

all zoogles are boogles (the answer is), just cuz it looks the same, doesnt mean it is the same....

BUT

sometimes they are, and sometimes, bad things happen... its up to us to judge life accordingly on the way we live it, certian things can get you in deep sh!t, physically, mentally, and in jailally...

if all zoogles are boogles, and i saw a boogle, wouldnt matter if it was a zoogle... cuz all zoogles are boogles...

all humans are the same regardless of how they look?

A somewhat brief description of Black Swan

To me this kind of stuff is like having 5 people standing shoulder to shoulder looking out a window.

All will see the same thing differently.

And in the end.....what does it matter?

As far as the topic of this thread goes.......no doubt either or both parties involved "could" have made many different choices......but they did what they did. To say that a 17 year old doesn't deserve to die might greatly depend on just what the facts are......and in any event, he's still dead. Is that good? bad? I don't know..... it is....that's it....it is.

Saddam Hussein was 17 once.........Charles Manson was too........

Too bad they both didn't die sooner, wouldn't you say?

most killers are wild animals: true, but not all are, some are humans, who arent wild nor technically animals...

most wild animals are killers: true, but not all are, some are vegitarians, in a way tho, they are killers as well, as vegetation is a living being...

this has confused the SH!T out of me... thanks alot... i will figure it out tho..

all potatoes are tomatos, did you see a potato? or was it a tomato?....


see that sh!t just confused me even more, because i know what each of them look like, and i sure as hell woulndt get them confused...

Try this redhook.........this may help......

All salmon are fish............you saw a fish........was it a salmon?

Now you SHOULD be able to reason out the answer.

not exactly, because there are many fish in the sea that look different...

i know this question is easy as hell too, my dad is probably laughing his a$$ off right now... it has litterally confused the hell out of me..

is this falling into the believe half of what you see, and none of what you hear category?

im more like a black duck... im not very swan like.

if i saw a zoogle, it had to be a boogle, because all zoogles are boogles...

True.......that part was already given......however the question is.........

If you saw a boogle.........is it a zoogle?

Remember:

All zoogles are boogles. You saw a boogle. Is it a zoogle?

Too bad I had the computer off....missed some of the non-sense.

How do you get to the point of "me saying" from what I posted? You are the one assuming, not I. Your proclamation was that it is ALWAYS bad when a 17 year old dies. My point was that by saying that you ASSUME that 17 is the only requirement to being a worthwhile individual. My point was that ALL people.....good and bad......are seventeen at one time (provided they live longer than that). Trevon was not exactly your roll model teen, was he? Kicked out of school, doing drugs, stealing,..........not a good start. Does that make him future cell bait? No, but it makes him more prone to be.
In this case this boogle could have been a zoogle, also may not have been a zoogle. One thing is for sure....this boogle bungled it.

bunglin boogles? thanks alot A$$..

i guess im just not college material... and i was thinking about going in for Welding, guess im screwed...

if zoogles are boogles, than boogles have to be zoogles at some point...

hmmmmmm.....

are you saying "are you sure what you saw"? are you positive if it was a thief, or a citizen?

thanks for doin this, ive remembered sh!t i forgot about that doesnt even have anything remotely associated with this, and forgot i even knew about it lol... awesome...

I don't believe De Morgan would necessarliy approve of that bit of
illogic. Besides not all theives are citizens and not all citizens are
theives.

i before e except after c

You're correct. I would have said you are right but right and left have taken on a whole new connotations.

scroll down and watch the Piers Morgan video..

http://theclicker.today.msnbc.msn.com/_n...ocid=ansmsnbc11