I believe JG makes sense above.

We know a few things for sure. We've always known that the original birthers were Democrats. It was a Hillary supporter who filed the first lawsuit demanding that Obama produce his mysterious birth certificate.

What we have learned is that the Obama Hussein Barrack himself was the very first Obama birther.
It turns out that Obama claimed he was Kenya-born before he claimed he was Hawaii-born.

Does anybody really believe for a minute that that 1991 promotional booklet put together by Obama's literary agency was not proof read and then proof read again. Or, that a ditzy libtard editor missed that the booklet stated that the Obama Hussein Barrack was born in Kenya. Not likely. No, not likely at all.

What is byfar more likely is that the Obama Hussein Barrack either wrote or approved his write-up. It's highly unlikely that the narcissitic Obama didn't approve his own biography. Then, like the article said, "no one corrected the record" until Obama's presidential aspirations became apparent.


Regardless of where the Obama Hussein Barrack was whelped, that fuker is one shady cat. There are a lot of records he won't release. What's he hiding?

"What's he hiding?"

That he's a socialist Kenyan Muslim, doncha' know?

Does anybody believe that a birth anoucement that was published about Pres Obama's birth in a Hawaii newspaper was a plant to confuse people 45 years later?

More than 1200 birth announcements between 1960 and 1965 were shown to contain Hawaiian addresses for registrants of births outside of the state of Hawaii, including more than three hundred in which the child was born outside of the United States.

Newspaper editors didn't even confirm native birth status. The newspaper doesn’t care if the birth occurred in the local hospital. They don’t even print the address of the birth. They publish the address of the registrant, not the birth place.

The Obama may have been born in Hawaii before he was born in Kenya.