What a fuckin rambling, non-cogent reply.
Just pointed out the conspiracy you referred to for clarity, and you piss a puddle in your chair.

Take a deep breath.

IdahoSH

Would a tissue or a nuk help you out?

I'll type more clearly, an slower for you, IdahoSH...

You and others like you who send money to the NRA, or ran to the nearest gun shop to buy all those guns that Obama was going to ban (but, of course, didn't)...

You are who they were talking about when they said "A fool and his money are soon parted".

Clear enough for you?

Part two...if you thing that strict constructionism is how the Constitution should be interpreted, and that "activist judges" are bad, and you support the Heller case, then you are no only a hypocrite and tool, but a dumbass to boot.

More understandable for you now?

Fish on...

Todd

The Heller case was brought to redress a local law that passed not allowing guns in the city limits of DC.
That law was first imposed to address the high death/murder rates that was rampant in the black communities of the city.

Obama referred to the "crime-ravaged communities" in direct reference to the problem within those ethnic communities and his support of the DC case.

So for the purpose of clarity and insight, I tried to lay out an overview of the Heller case, Fast & Furious, the community involved that the DC law meant to protect, and the conspiracy Todd brought up that he over heard on Fox News.

I know what all that is about...which, of course, has nothing to do with any actual conspiracy...F&F has nothing to do with any gun grabbing, nor has anything Obama has done in over three years had anything to do with gun grabbing.

To think otherwise is to just empower the lying sacksofshit over at the NRA to take your money for no reason whatsoever.

Here's your "facts"...and even though it's Maddow asking the question, who is clearly a partisan, it's the right wing morons who are utterly detached from reality who are showing just how smart they are.

With no facts to back up their assertions, where do you think they got the idea that Holder was after their guns, and that they needed to protest?

FoxNews, and the NRA...just tools and puppets who would go out to protest if they were told that Obama intends to pass a law making all space mans who live on Pluto to give up their guns and abort all babies who aren't Kenyans.



Join the crowd, IdahoSH...looks like there's room for another sign holder who's still living in GWB's world of non-reality.

Fish on...

Todd

still nothing but rambling and helter-skelter libtard muttering.
type as slow as you want but it won't put a brain in your head.

did you mop up that puddle?

Fast & Furious

Oblamy: saw it on TV
Holder: read about it in a paper
Napolitano: no fuckin clue

Think Air-Head administration.
Knock Knock... Nobody home?
Libtards all spaced out on F & F.

Should I go look for that nuk?

Or perhaps a tampon?

And, I know Todd was watchin' that hottie Megyn Kelly on Fox.
That's where the suggestion of a conspiracy was mentioned.
He tunes into her everyday to learn something, and drool.

Did I say Megyn is a hottie?

Save um Dan.
You'll need um for the next time I tear in to Oblamy.

Fox has cornered the market on hot babes!

Really?

You have to be phvcking kidding. How old are you sunshine?

It's not the "deciding" factor. It's a fact.

A quick internet search will prove what you don't want to acknowledge.

Perhaps you can show the class how it's not so.

Detroit
Watts
Newark
Philly
Compton
Houston
Chicago

Well it's relevant because it's the high crime, minority dominated cities that have attempted to disregard the Constitutional guarantee for the "right to bear arms". When that right was infringed it was necessary for the Supreme court to uphold that basic right. Hence Heller.

You don't see 'Heller vs. Cheyenne' or 'Heller vs. Winnemuca'. It's always a Chicago, DC, New York, Detroit that needs to protect themselves from those that have no regard for any law. That's why law abiding citizens in those chit holes have to fight for the right to protect themselves. The precise reason 'shall not be infringed' means just that. Unfortunately there are phvck sticks that attribute one Constitutional right being excercised as "judicial activism" but those same phvck sticks would cry their wasted education away over the infringement of 'free speech'. They are the same dipchits that (rightfully so) stand up for the occupy movement but decry any other excercise of rights.

Get it?

Sweet...racist gun nuts.

'Merica the beautiful.

Fish on...

Todd

P.S. Don't know who Megan Kelly is...not sure what show was on. It was a dark haired chick, if that helps.

Yup the original gun laws were to keep those recently enfranchised
folks from having the means to defend themselves.
All your Odd, take it from there.

An armed population are called citizens.
An unarmed population are called subjects.