O'Keefe Films DNC Employee at OFA-Houston Helping Woman Vote Twice; More to Come






By Tom Blumer | October 10, 2012 | 12:47

James O'Keefe's Project Veritas has done it again -- with, as is usually the case with his efforts, apparently more to come.

His latest effort, a six-minute video (direct YouTube link) which near its end taunts the establishment press ("Put your reputation on the line, journalists. Say this is an "isolated incident"), "exposes Obama campaign workers, including a Regional Field Director at Organizing for America (OFA), engaged in election fraud."

He promises that the video "will have you outraged at the illegal activity going on behind the scenes of President Obama's re-election effort - and we're just getting started!"

He's definitely right about generating outrage, at least in me:

video of fraud..........go to link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=q_iJfnbMzI0

Here is just a bit of Matthew Boyle's "read the whole thing" post at the Daily Caller about O'Keefe's latest:


Videographer James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas caught an official for President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign helping who she thought was an Obama supporter set herself up to vote more than once in November.

Stephanie Caballero is the regional field director for Obama’s Organizing For America in Houston, Texas. Federal Election Commission documents show, according to Project Veritas, that Caballero is a “salaried employee of the DNC [Democratic National Committee].”

Caballero is caught on camera helping the young woman try to vote in Florida and Texas in the upcoming election.

... (in the video) O’Keefe then “a few weeks later,” his videographer went back to the office to follow up. Caballero gave her a Florida absentee ballot application to “help her vote twice.”

After Caballero sets the videographer up to vote in Florida, she asked the Project Veritas investigator: “Are you going to do what I think you’re going do?”

The videographer responded: “Well, I mean, if no one’s gonna know…”

Caballero audibly laughed, then said: “You’re so hilarious!”

As to the "we're just getting started!" assertion, the video's end teases what appear to be a future episode of a person who wants to vote in both Minnesota and New York, and also appears to promise to show proof of disparate treatment of those involved in registering voters, depending on whether they self-identify as Democrats or Republicans.

On the one hand, I can't wait. On the other hand, it is really disconcerting to see how casual about everything these lawbreakers are.


http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/...twice-more-come















• Democrats frustrated by dopey Obama Big Bird ad (Reuters)
• Jack Welch: I Was Right About That Strange Jobs Report (Wall Street Journal)
• Poll war: Rasmussen flicks off NBC's Chuck Todd (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
• New companies file suit against ObamaCare HHS mandate (Live Action News)
• Pollster: We won't survey Va., Fla., or NC since Romney will win them (Hot Air)
• There was no protest at the Benghazi consulate as was initially reported (Yid w/Lid)
• Romney signs defaced with excrement in Va. (WashTimes)
• Actually, Alec Baldwin, Obama would be losing bigtime if he were white (Patriot Update)






User Shortcuts

Log in

•My account
•My buddylist
•Log in to check messages
•RSS feed
•About NB
•Contact us
•Jobs
•Advertise on NB

















Michelle Malkin

Malkin Column: Stimulus Sheriff Joe Biden Is Missing-in-Action






David Limbaugh

David Limbaugh Column: Obama Would Double Down in a Second Term






Chuck Norris

Chuck Norris: Reflections On True Patriotism






R. Emmett Tyrre...

R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. Column: Autumn In New York






Walter E. Williams

Walter Williams Column: 'Trickle-Down' Attack on Tax Cuts Is, Always Has Been Intellectually Dishonest

More >

















Obama Shrugged



more cartoons





Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/...e#ixzz28xaUcHYg

http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2012/10/vote-early-vote-often/

Perhaps this is how Todd thinks Obama will get to 270.

Anyone who trumpets up the trumped up claims of "fraud", of which there are very, very little actual instances, while supporting the actual disenfranshisment of thousands and thousands of actual American voters...is a fraud themselves...a fraudulent American.

Fish on...

Todd

So strange that you have to show 3 forms of ID to get a job but not to vote. The trumped up disenfranshisment of thousands and thousands of actual American voters doesn't stand the light of day. The poor can't afford to get a drivers license or ID so how can they get a job without proper ID?

Irrelevant, Hank...are you saying you support Americans not getting to exercise their right to vote if they don't have whatever ID a state is asking for?

Please don't even pretend that you believe the intent of those laws is to protect the vote from fraud, and that it's not intended to do exactly what PA's Governor said it was for...to disenfranchise Democratic voters.

Even pretending otherwise for one second is a pile of horseshit, and you know it, and there is nothing...nothing...more un-American than trying to stop Americans from exercising the most fundamental American right, that of voting.

Fish on...

Todd

i wonder who this 71% are. i have never been ask or talked to anyone that has been ask about this.

do anyone of you know a person who has been asked about this?

Your fullofshit, and you know it, and it's obvious.

The intent...sole intent...is to stop Americans from voting...and those who support that are not Americans, they're assholes, and they know it, too, which is why they always react like children when called on it.

Fish on...

Todd

Horseshit.

You guys are confusing "it's easy to comply" with "why is the rule there at all?".

The rules are proposed to stop people from voting...even the proponents admit it when they think the cameras aren't watching (which also shows how stupid they are, the cameras are always watching).

Fish on...

Todd

The voter ID laws are purporting to solve a problem that doesn't even exist...which is why you have to ask "why are they attempting to pass them at all?".

Since there is no actual voter fraud, then what are they trying to accomplish?

Putting obstacles in the way of a fundamental American right like voting to solve a nonexistent problem should be distressing to every single American...well, Americans that believe in America and the rights that come with being an American, that is.

The rest would be better off in North Korea.

Fish on...

Todd

You already know its done thru polling. It would not surprise me, if it was higher. The minority shouts the loudest and always claims to represent the People

This is not about keep americans from voting. It to keep felons and illegal aliens from voting and keeping democrats from voting twice. In two or more states.

Todd.......


You looking for another sig line, fool?

the biggest case of voter fraud seems to be in Florida bought and paid for by the republican party

[Bleeeeep!]. Over 1000 felons were allowed to vote and they voted heavily for Al Franken, who won by 312 votes. Its the same reason democrats want convicts serving time, to be able to vote. Cause democrats are soft on crime. They dont care how they win. They have been convicted of voting in two states, buying votes, and of course supporting acorn with tax dollars to do their work for them. It makes me wonder how you were ever serious about the law.

http://washingtonexaminer.com/york-when-1099-felons-vote-in-race-won-by-312-ballots/article/2504163

You dont care how you win, its obvious, and you know it, and thats saying somethin. Only if your candidates were losing would you care. ID was required in Wa. So they have a voting problem in seattle or the county and the election manager moves to california, while they stick the rest of us, with vote by mail. I wait till the last day, so do thousand, because I dont want my ballot hidden away. Gregoire kept counting until she won. Out of state money paid for her recount. Win at all cost, the ends, justifies the means.

Do those convicted felons have proper ID?

Yes, they do...would they have been able to vote, law or no?

Yes, most of them would.

The rest of your post is utter garbage regurgitated directly from right wing fruitcake idiotology.

Fish on...

Todd

Perhaps you can link the independent recounts that show Gore won?

He would have if tens of thousands of eligible voters, nearly all black, had not been disenfranchised by the State of Florida's Republican Party.

The fact that you're willing to accept a voter suppression law to solve a problem that doesn't even exist, but don't mind seeing tens of thousands of American voters having their votes thrown in the garbage shows just what an unAmerican jackass you are.

When I mentioned those who would be better off in North Korea, I was talking to you.

Fish on...

Todd

Those same disenfranchised voters would show I'd all day long for something free but cannot muster up an ID card to vote.

There is a process they have to go thru to get voting rights back. If they do that, I have no problem with it. Minnesota felons apparently were not qualified to vote.

The irony here is that, people who drop out of society and work off the clock, run from the law etc, probably wont vote. More than likely, they are the people who are used to fraudulently elect people and never know about it. According to some new reports, Both Obama and Clinton failed to qualify for the ballot in a couple areas. Thaddeus McCotter resigned for the same reason.

If you should not need ID, what prevents democrats from driving across state line and voting again?

Like activist judges they are only disenfranchised when they're prevented from illegally voting for the candidate the dems like.