Not so. If it can't create jobs then it has no control over job creation or the lack of.

those dollars should be returned to the tax payer.

Stlhead has logic that only works if you say the govern created the money. It is not a handout when they take 36% of someones income as opposed to 40%. That 4% less they come in and take because they can is not a handout or welfare you jacka$$. I have attempted many times to explain it to you without success so wont beat the dead and dumb horse.

That logic does play good in liberalland though. Not to be confused with legoland where things are actually get built.

Would that include deductions and subsidies for say, solar power? I've read somewhere the gubmint props up solar to the tune of about $775 per megawatt hour. In contrast, those subsidies for other forms of energy like natural gas, coal, and oil get 64 cents of subsidies per unit.

How about tariffs? Are they anti-capitalism? The U.S. International Trade Commission unanimously decided this week that solar panels from China will now be subject to tariffs of about 24 to 36%. It would seem to me if someone wanted to promote sources of alternative energy, they wouldn't make them more expensive for consumers.

What if "they" take 0% of a corporations income, then send out a tax refund and award subsidies? Still no handouts? You sir are an idiot.

You have come very close to describing the EITC.

And by the way, those who live in glass houses should refrain from throwing stones.