Exactly...

Timber, I said to read the whole sentence, and now I'll say it again...if you leave your gun unsecured and it is stolen then you get to burn, too.

Locking it up and having it stolen is not "leaving it unsecured".

Fish on...

Todd

No, it's not funny...because I am not talking to anti-gun folks, I am talking to idiots like Sol Dunce who profess to be pro-gun but hurt gun advocates far more than antis ever will.

Fish on...

Todd

You didn't miss anything....... Just Todd rambling thinking he's funny with the 40 and pall mall instead of really thinking about it....

Sol Dunce has an IQ of 74? Who'd a thunk it?

Quit whining you drippy kUNT.

You're missing a 1 in front of the 7 SG.

Sol hook.

Mine is 401...one higher than Red Stein.

nope. Just like everyone should lock their cars. If you don't and it gets stolen it's all on you. But it shouldn't be illegal to not lock it up. Know your environment and act accordingly.

ok with that premise, your house is your car, you dont carry a 1700 pound gun safe in it, so if your window gets smashed in your locked car, should you still get in trouble?

cuz most people lock their houses and still have firearms stolen...

gun safes also dont stop anything, they hinder it...

There are guns safes for cars and reread my post Columbo.

I have one in my truck, that only gets used seldom. I carry everywhere I go where it's legal. <wink> Because I'm a very responsible person with no police record. Been carrying since 85'...never once had to draw my weapon. I agree with SG that I594 will sadly pass. The recent school shooting didn't do us any favors.

SCREW LIBERALS LIKE TODD AND HIS ILK.

I carry everywhere. Being exempt has its perks

you are missing the point... sh!t will happen, if someone wants something you have they will take it...

locked or not...

and dont forget, cops get their guns stolen too...

Get a job schmuck.

[quote=Evo]you are missing the point... sh!t will happen, if someone wants something you have they will take it...

locked or not...

and dont forget, cops get their guns stolen too... [/quote

But why not lock it up and add an ounce of deterance? Your point of view is one of a victim.

Most cops that have their weapons stolen often leave them unsecured.

again, you are missing the point..

if someone wants something, they will get it...

you lock it up in your car, what happens if the car gets stolen? you cant steal a house...

if you leave your pistol on the table and your kid gets it and kills a classmate yeah, you go to jail to.... if you have a 12 gauge in your locked house by your bed and someone kicks the door in while you are on vacation and takes said gun, calling them irresponsible because it wasnt locked up inside an enclosure that could be broken into just like the enclosure they just broke into to get to said enclosure, is fvckin stupid....

if someone wants your sh!t with ill intent, they will take it... if none of you have figured that out yet, you have a rude awakening coming...

Not worth it RB3, and don't argue with Hank either, he thinks he wins by being that last person to have their say. Proof is his tens of thousands of posts.

They are not missing the point..you are..you cant create laws that curtail to everyone in every specific situation, they are created from a broad range of dumbfacks actions and designed to cover a large net. Fear mongering over specifics does nothing to help anyone in the long run, it's not how the law was intended or written... bit the wording may save your ass someday when your on the victims side of things

And if you want an example of how "wording" comes into play in these and other "common sense" cases (not to change the subject) but reference the recent king county charges against a young C.P. Sticken woman held captive for 9 months, people responsible get 9 month in home monitoring BECAUSE of the wording of charge limitations and etc