#957256 - 05/11/16 01:34 PM
Re: North of Falcon/PMFC update
[Re: deerlick]
|
Juvenile at Sea
Registered: 09/05/14
Posts: 195
Loc: Stanwood WA
|
The last minute add ons by the tribes is what pisses me off about this whole process. They want the state to bargain in good faith yet applied for their permit early and now add more restrictions on recreation anglers. I'd rather have the state tell them to pound sand then accept a [Bleeeeep!] agreement. SF +1 +2 here too! Been looking for a large clothespin for my nose at Lowes and Home Depot recently as all this smells to high heaven!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#957257 - 05/11/16 01:39 PM
Re: North of Falcon/PMFC update
[Re: Sky-Guy]
|
Lord of the Chums
Registered: 03/29/14
Posts: 6773
|
I just don't get his they can blatantly lie about it and no-one bats an eye....
_________________________
BLM IS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION ANTIFA IS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#957258 - 05/11/16 01:42 PM
Re: North of Falcon/PMFC update
[Re: stonefish]
|
Juvenile at Sea
Registered: 02/23/08
Posts: 171
Loc: Pierce county
|
The last minute add ons by the tribes is what pisses me off about this whole process. They want the state to bargain in good faith yet applied for their permit early and now add more restrictions on recreation anglers. I'd rather have the state tell them to pound sand then accept a [Bleeeeep!] agreement. SF +3........No Deal!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#957262 - 05/11/16 01:58 PM
Re: North of Falcon/PMFC update
[Re: stonefish]
|
The Tide changed
Registered: 08/31/00
Posts: 7083
Loc: Everett
|
And this, following a year of increased meetings between the tribes and last years NOF. One of the requests from the advisor panel was to meet sooner to prevent this from occurring again. All the meetings in the world help no one when one party attempts to sabotage the process for their own benefit.
_________________________
You know something bad is going to happen when you hear..."Hey, hold my beer and watch this"
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#957273 - 05/11/16 03:41 PM
Re: North of Falcon/PMFC update
[Re: Sky-Guy]
|
Lord of the Chums
Registered: 03/29/14
Posts: 6773
|
I believe that's tribal harvest, they are taking 58 percent and the WDFW wants to drop that to 50 percent and the tribes are saying no way, they don't want us fishing for them at all....
Boldt decision working flawlessly....
_________________________
BLM IS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION ANTIFA IS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#957274 - 05/11/16 03:54 PM
Re: North of Falcon/PMFC update
[Re: MPM]
|
Spawner
Registered: 02/06/08
Posts: 511
|
Maybe someone can clarify something for me. I've heard that the biggest sticking point right now is getting Puyallup harvest of Chinook from 58% to 50%. Is that including modeled incidental impacts? Is that referring to hatchery or wild Chinook? It seems to me that we should be going for much more than 50% harvest of hatchery Chinook.
I just don't understand what that number is really referring to. The 50% exploitation rate that was mentioned is for naturally produced Chinook. That would include catch in directed Chinook fisheries as well as incidental catch in other fisheries. I guess I also should edit this for Evo. These are total exploitation rates from all fisheries.
Edited by OncyT (05/11/16 03:57 PM) Edit Reason: Edited for Evo
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#957278 - 05/11/16 05:41 PM
Re: North of Falcon/PMFC update
[Re: Sky-Guy]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 11/25/01
Posts: 2834
Loc: Marysville
|
OncyT ia correct.
The 50% exploitation is for the wild ESA listed Chinook and comes from the Co-managers Puget Sound Chinook management plan (latest edition is from 2010) and federally approved. The 50% exploitation includes all fishing mortality - directed and incidental. Those allowable impacts were determined after detailed modeling such that fishing at or below those levels would not significantly increase the likelihood of extinct over the next century. A couple assumptions were used; one that habitat would not become worst and two that recent low marine survivals would continue.
The rub is what fisheries will be constrained to reduce the over all impacts down to 50%. The tribes want a sharing of those reduction even though account for the majority of the total impacts.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#957280 - 05/11/16 06:14 PM
Re: North of Falcon/PMFC update
[Re: Smalma]
|
Spawner
Registered: 02/06/08
Posts: 511
|
The 50% exploitation is for the wild ESA listed Chinook and comes from the Co-managers Puget Sound Chinook management plan (latest edition is from 2010) and federally approved. The 50% exploitation includes all fishing mortality - directed and incidental. Those allowable impacts were determined after detailed modeling such that fishing at or below those levels would not significantly increase the likelihood of extinct over the next century. Yes you are correct Curt, but it very likely that this population is simply being sustained by spawning of strays from the hatchery program, so it is also likely that a 58% (or higher) harvest rate would not significantly increase the likelihood of extinction over the next century as the population is being maintained by the hatchery program. Should it happen to become extinct during that time, the managers could simply go back to the hatchery population and let them spawn wherever they want, and pretty much end up with the same population. That is what is so infuriating about the fact that limitations of harvest on this particular population is what is driving the near term existence of Puget Sound fisheries.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#957281 - 05/11/16 06:19 PM
Re: North of Falcon/PMFC update
[Re: Sky-Guy]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 11/25/01
Posts: 2834
Loc: Marysville
|
Without a doubt most of the south Sound Chinook are being supported by natural spawning hatchery fish (integrated program). The Puyallup Chinook normally do not constrain mixed stock fisheries and only do so this year is the tribal position of not sharing the impacts equitably.
Curt
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#957282 - 05/11/16 06:49 PM
Re: North of Falcon/PMFC update
[Re: Sky-Guy]
|
Spawner
Registered: 02/06/08
Posts: 511
|
Then you understand that it is not very likely for a composite population made up of 90% hatchery fish being fished at a rate that can't be sustained by the natural population to actually show any increase in productivity. Abundance, of course, can be increased by the contribution of the hatchery component of the population. What is being accomplished by managing overall PS fisheries based on exploitation rate limitations on this particular population? I suggest again, that this entire approach is a sham.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#957290 - 05/12/16 07:10 AM
Re: North of Falcon/PMFC update
[Re: Sky-Guy]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 11/21/07
Posts: 7634
Loc: Olema,California,Planet Earth
|
Reading what Curt wrote about the plan is disturbing. The "goal" of the supposed recovery plan is simply the prevention of extinction. Not recovery. So, if they are successful we keep those stocks listed in perpetuity.
At the same time, everybody else (habitat, hydro, hatcheries) have to actually make things better.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#957297 - 05/12/16 10:24 AM
Re: North of Falcon/PMFC update
[Re: Sky-Guy]
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 05/31/08
Posts: 257
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#957299 - 05/12/16 11:56 AM
Re: North of Falcon/PMFC update
[Re: Sky-Guy]
|
Smolt
Registered: 09/20/06
Posts: 92
Loc: Renton
|
It's amazing that with salmon nowhere near those lakes, a guy can't even toss out a bobber and worm. Meanwhile, the tribes never missed a day.
At least enforcement appears to be understanding by just handing out warnings.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#957301 - 05/12/16 12:03 PM
Re: North of Falcon/PMFC update
[Re: Sky-Guy]
|
Lord of the Chums
Registered: 03/29/14
Posts: 6773
|
Lake Washington and Sammamish have Salmon in them year round....
_________________________
BLM IS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION ANTIFA IS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#957304 - 05/12/16 12:43 PM
Re: North of Falcon/PMFC update
[Re: Sky-Guy]
|
Smolt
Registered: 09/20/06
Posts: 92
Loc: Renton
|
Sprouts maybe, it would be interesting to see what the impact calculations are for the perch fisherman. The fact that's some huge concern is unbelievable. Removing a perch( or a trout or bass for that matter) from the lake prevents them eating the smolts! Its likely a positive impact but those common sense thoughts have no place in the states management. They only seem to be interested in figures that are negative.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#957318 - 05/12/16 03:48 PM
Re: North of Falcon/PMFC update
[Re: Sky-Guy]
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 08/15/12
Posts: 247
|
I would be absolutely gobsmacked if there have been any actual tickets written
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#957322 - 05/12/16 05:22 PM
Re: North of Falcon/PMFC update
[Re: Sky-Guy]
|
Lord of the Chums
Registered: 03/29/14
Posts: 6773
|
_________________________
BLM IS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION ANTIFA IS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
11499 Members
17 Forums
72933 Topics
825122 Posts
Max Online: 3937 @ 07/19/24 03:28 AM
|
|
|