#984122 - 01/24/18 07:18 PM
Commissions Turn to Prove Support for Transparency
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 10/26/12
Posts: 1057
Loc: Graham, WA
|
URGENT! SHARE THIS WITH EVERYONE. EVERYTHING WE’VE WORKED FOR COMES DOWN TO THIS. IF YOU WANT TO HAVE ANY CHANCE AT OPEN, FAIR AND EQUITABLE FISHERIES, YOU MUST ACT NOW!! The Commission will be discussing on a conference call our request to CONVERT THE NORTH OF FALCON POLICY TO A WAC (Washington Administrative Code) on 2 Feb at 8:30 AM, FOLLOWED BY A VOTE. THERE WILL BE NO PUBLIC INPUT ALLOWED ON THE CALL, SO YOU MUST LET THEM KNOW YOU SUPPORT THIS BEFORE THE CALL! IF THEY VOTE NO, WE HAVE LOST! THERE IS NO HOPE OF ANY MANDATE FOR OPEN MEETINGS. ALL OUR WORK COMES DOWN TO THIS! EVERYONE MUST WRITE THE COMMISSION AND TELL THEM TO APPROVE THE CONVERSION! THEY WILL MONITOR THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE, SO WE MUST HAVE A TREMENDOUS TURN OUT BOTH IN SUPPORT LETTERS AND PEOPLE LISTENING ON THE CALL!! WE CANNOT STRESS HOW IMPORTANT THIS IS!! Write an email to the Commission: commission@DFW.WA.GOV Call in and get a pin to be on the call: (360) 902-2267 PLEASE SHARE THIS POST! Conf. Call Agenda, Convert NOF policy to a WAC
_________________________
"Forgiveness is between them and God. My job is to arrange the meeting."
1Sgt U.S. Army (Ret)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#984123 - 01/24/18 07:32 PM
Re: Commissions Turn to Prove Support for Transparency
[Re: Bay wolf]
|
Juvenile at Sea
Registered: 03/22/06
Posts: 106
Loc: snohomish county
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#984128 - 01/24/18 09:11 PM
Re: Commissions Turn to Prove Support for Transparency
[Re: Cozmo]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 10/26/12
Posts: 1057
Loc: Graham, WA
|
Conversion? Conversion of what? Converting the North of Falcon from a policy (which is advisory) to a WAC (Washington Administrative Act) which is a rule, and therefore binding.
_________________________
"Forgiveness is between them and God. My job is to arrange the meeting."
1Sgt U.S. Army (Ret)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#984142 - 01/25/18 08:24 AM
Re: Commissions Turn to Prove Support for Transparency
[Re: Bay wolf]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 04/20/09
Posts: 1249
Loc: WaRshington
|
Sent.
Thank you for your continued diligent efforts, BW.
_________________________
When I grow up I want to be, One of the harvesters of the sea. I think before my days are done, I want to be a fisherman.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#984145 - 01/25/18 10:12 AM
Re: Commissions Turn to Prove Support for Transparency
[Re: Bay wolf]
|
Juvenile at Sea
Registered: 04/15/11
Posts: 113
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#984147 - 01/25/18 11:03 AM
Re: Commissions Turn to Prove Support for Transparency
[Re: Bay wolf]
|
Fry
Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 37
Loc: Kirkland
|
If we change NOF from advisory to WAC is this binding on the treaty tribes.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#984149 - 01/25/18 11:20 AM
Re: Commissions Turn to Prove Support for Transparency
[Re: redlodge]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 04/25/00
Posts: 5003
Loc: East of Aberdeen, West of Mont...
|
If we change NOF from advisory to WAC is this binding on the treaty tribes. I'm thinking the tribes march to the beat of their own drum !!! I'd guess NO....
_________________________
"Worse day sport fishing, still better than the best day working"
"I thought growing older, would take longer"
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#984151 - 01/25/18 11:30 AM
Re: Commissions Turn to Prove Support for Transparency
[Re: redlodge]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 10/26/12
Posts: 1057
Loc: Graham, WA
|
If we change NOF from advisory to WAC is this binding on the treaty tribes. Drifters guess is how we read it also. NO. As sovereign governments, they would not be subject to the WAC. It would however apply to the Department, and as a rule they could not ignore it as advisory. But we are putting the cart before the horse. First, we need the Commission to agree to the conversion. Then starts the process of CR101, CR102 etc, and thats where we can start the discussion on who the rules apply and to what the rules will address. You see, in that process, there is Public Input sessions, and that is where we need to be active and strong!
_________________________
"Forgiveness is between them and God. My job is to arrange the meeting."
1Sgt U.S. Army (Ret)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#984153 - 01/25/18 11:35 AM
Re: Commissions Turn to Prove Support for Transparency
[Re: Bay wolf]
|
King of the Beach
Registered: 12/11/02
Posts: 5187
Loc: Carkeek Park
|
Email sent. SF
_________________________
Go Dawgs! Founding Member - 2023 Pink Plague Opposition Party #coholivesmatter
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#984203 - 01/25/18 04:54 PM
Re: Commissions Turn to Prove Support for Transparency
[Re: Bay wolf]
|
Fry
Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 37
Loc: Kirkland
|
I think there are three things that we have to recognize with this problem with the salmon. To me the most important is to get the general public highly involved in what is going on. Most do not have a clue. Second, we have to regonize the fact that in Puget Sound there is no recovering the wild fish that will support what we want to use the fish for. Third is to gain leverage on the tribes to bring them under control. There are in the process of taking over control of the state of Washington political enviroment one little piece at a time.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#984216 - 01/25/18 06:04 PM
Re: Commissions Turn to Prove Support for Transparency
[Re: Bay wolf]
|
Juvenile at Sea
Registered: 06/30/14
Posts: 135
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#984239 - 01/26/18 07:12 AM
Re: Commissions Turn to Prove Support for Transparency
[Re: Bay wolf]
|
Juvenile at Sea
Registered: 01/03/17
Posts: 155
Loc: Hood Canal
|
Message sent with emphasis.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#984249 - 01/26/18 10:26 AM
Re: Commissions Turn to Prove Support for Transparency
[Re: Bay wolf]
|
Poon it! Poon it! Poon it!
Registered: 08/08/06
Posts: 1714
Loc: Yarrow Point
|
It's interesting, I don't believe it's actually binding on the Tribes, but it would presumably be binding on the STATE participants. Interesting.
But Baywolf, I went and read the policy draft and don't see ANYTHING which will change the transparency you are looking for. There's language about "striving" to improve communications, and including observers in "appropriate" meetings, but nothing at all binding. Am I missing something?
Edited by IrishRogue (01/26/18 10:33 AM)
_________________________
The charm of fishing is that it is the pursuit of what is elusive but attainable, a perpetual series of occasions for hope. -John Buchan
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#984250 - 01/26/18 10:33 AM
Re: Commissions Turn to Prove Support for Transparency
[Re: Bay wolf]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 10/26/12
Posts: 1057
Loc: Graham, WA
|
I just got a tally There have only been 70 support messages received at the Commission office!There are over 675 views on this post, and all we can muster is a few people to take the time to send in a short email urging the commission to vote "yes". OK Here is an example, and a link to send a message: Commissioners, As a stakeholder I urge you to vote "YES" on the proposed conversion to the North of Falcon Policy to a WAC. Recent events have shown that using advisory policies are insufficient as instructions to the Department. Please, vote YES and start the process with a CR101 immediately. Here is a link to send this to the Commission: Send a message to the Commission
_________________________
"Forgiveness is between them and God. My job is to arrange the meeting."
1Sgt U.S. Army (Ret)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#984252 - 01/26/18 10:56 AM
Re: Commissions Turn to Prove Support for Transparency
[Re: Bay wolf]
|
Fry
Registered: 09/28/11
Posts: 23
Loc: Snoho
|
sent. Thanks for your effort in this.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#984254 - 01/26/18 11:10 AM
Re: Commissions Turn to Prove Support for Transparency
[Re: IrishRogue]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 10/26/12
Posts: 1057
Loc: Graham, WA
|
It's interesting, I don't believe it's actually binding on the Tribes, but it would presumably be binding on the STATE participants. Interesting.
But Baywolf, I went and read the policy draft and don't see ANYTHING which will change the transparency you are looking for. There's language about "striving" to improve communications, and including observers in "appropriate" meetings, but nothing at all binding. Am I missing something? Within the conversion process is a series of steps. CR101, CR102 etc. It is within the CR102 that the Commission will take public input for the making of the rule. It is then that we MUST again RALLY the troops and insist that transparency be written into the WAC! Believe me, I wish this was an easier process. We've been spending our lives the last year and a half on this. The power players DON'T want change, and they are very powerful indeed. Our power comes from our numbers and our all pushing in the same direction. It's like herding cats though. Everyone is very easily distracted and there are sooo many issues in our fisheries to get distracted with. If we have any hope at all of breaking the secret meetings open, it starts with the conversion...if it dies, we die!
_________________________
"Forgiveness is between them and God. My job is to arrange the meeting."
1Sgt U.S. Army (Ret)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#984327 - 01/27/18 11:00 AM
Re: Commissions Turn to Prove Support for Transparency
[Re: Bay wolf]
|
Alevin
Registered: 03/29/13
Posts: 19
Loc: Hood Canal
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#984368 - 01/27/18 03:00 PM
Re: Commissions Turn to Prove Support for Transparency
[Re: Bay wolf]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 10/26/12
Posts: 1057
Loc: Graham, WA
|
Thanks to everyone who’s sent in an email or message supporting this. With every person we grow stronger.
_________________________
"Forgiveness is between them and God. My job is to arrange the meeting."
1Sgt U.S. Army (Ret)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#984395 - 01/27/18 09:17 PM
Re: Commissions Turn to Prove Support for Transparency
[Re: Bay wolf]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 08/26/02
Posts: 4681
Loc: Sequim
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
1 registered (fishbadger),
996
Guests and
12
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
11499 Members
17 Forums
72912 Topics
824728 Posts
Max Online: 3937 @ 07/19/24 03:28 AM
|
|
|