The first President I've ever heard advocate for straight-up gun grabbing without due process.

Nice.

Oh, and Ben Carson can't get a decent office chair for 5 grand. He did find a nice 30 grand dining set, though.

This administration makes Hillary and Obama look like amateurs.



So much winning.

Lol at those who voted for him. Scared of the consequences.

He is manipulating your brain Dan.
Buy gun company stock.
Lol.

That's because they were...

lol - the first thing I thought when he said that was "is he fuckin' with me?"

2008- "Obama is coming for your guns!!!" Fear causes the price of ARs to skyrocket. Can't buy .22LRs in any store. No new gun control laws are passed in EIGHT YEARS. (executive actions do not equal laws)

2018- "M.A.G.A.!!!!!!" Get ready for new restrictions and laws.

2018 - "I really believe I'd run in there even if I didn't have a weapon."

1968- I had severe bone spurs but they didn't require surgery." This despite playing numerous sports in school and having no history of such problems.

Weird... It's almost like he and the GOP keep lying but certain people keep believing it...

After all the whackadoodles think that there is a Democrat behind every tree trying to grab their guns, the first President who actually proposes such a thing is, of course, the Trumpster Fire.

Will there be outrage? Of course not. The Trumponians will probably cheer him on.

Why?

Because they are utterly devoid of anything even resembling logic, consistency, or brains.

The NRA would give any other politician an immediate "F Grade", they'll probably gargle Trump right down to their liver.

Fish on...

Todd

if Trump doesnt do anything, you bitch... if Trump does do something, you bitch....

got it....

guess you werent paying attention when your LIBERAL DEMOCRATS voted to do the EXACT SAME THING recently....

where was the outrage?



https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/...m=.47468d2a3361

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/...m=.9a629a70d6d4

https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/state-to-let-courts-take-guns-from-people-deemed-a-threat/

You're a fuckin idiot, Evo.

Fish on...

Todd

You are so dumb. Comparing a gun law in the tiny liberal state of Rhode Island to what the prez of the USA says is proof.

"California, Connecticut, Indiana, Oregon and Washington already have red flag laws. More than a dozen other states are considering similar bills."

must have missed that part, huh.....

"In the wake of massacres similar to Wednesday’s school shooting in Parkland, Fla., a small number of states have passed “red flag laws” that allow the seizure of guns before people can commit acts of violence.

California, Washington, Oregon, Indiana and Connecticut have statutes that can be used to temporarily take guns away from people a judge deems a threat to themselves or others. Lawmakers in 18 other states — including Florida — plus the District of Columbia have proposed similar measures.

At the federal level, Rep. Salud Carbajal (D-Calif.) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) introduced legislation last May that would encourage states to adopt the approach."


and that part too, huh.....

Evo forgot about the due process part of the discussion.

That's kind of important to anyone paying attention.

lol...

if someone calls the police, and says "my son is acting very violently, and he has guns", the police will be told my a court if a judge deems that to be a credible threat, to temporarily take away the firearms until they show they are otherwise capable of possesing said firearms...

they havent committed a crime, all they did was got "deemed" violent...

thats not due process....

it is however, exactly what hes talking about, and exactly what is in place in Washington, and other states, and is exactly what the 2 democrats in California introduced into legislation last MAY.....

The police asking the judge and him deeming the threat credible isn't due process?

I knew better than to debate anything with you.

what do you charge them with? acting violent? thats a crime? if so, the majority of liberals should be locked up, look at what they have done during their bullsh!t marches and protests....

and, if its a credible threat, and they end up getting their guns back, because they were deemed safe enough to possess them, was it really a credible threat in the first place?

there is no court on this issue, its like a warrant, it basically IS a warrant, the cops go to the judge, and the judge signs it, and they go confiscate... THEN the person gets to go to court to get their guns back, THATS the due process part of it...

having guns taken from you before you have committed a crime with them is exactly what Trump is saying, what is in place in Wa, and what the other 2 democrats from Cali brought to legislation last MAY....

but not one democrat bitched then, because its easier to blame Trump.....

"Trump interrupted. “Or, Mike, take the firearms first and then go to court,” he said. “Because a lot of times, by the time you go to court, it takes so long to go to court, to get the due process procedures. I like taking the guns early, like in this crazy man's case that just took place in Florida. … To go to court would have taken a long time.”"


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powe...m=.42e1cbc107c4

Slo vs Chuck


I miss those days......

Ok. So Trump is just like gun- grabbing Democrat fuckheads, and that's cool with Evo because hugging Trump's nuts is more important than due process.

I stand corrected.

no Dan, its not cool with me... im sick and tired of people bashing the guy when their party did the exact same sh!t and its ACTUALLY LAW in some places.... Trump just talked about it, so go for the throat....

and no, im not for what he said either, that means that people can just randomly say sh!t and get people in trouble, sure, they may get in trouble themselves later down the line, but the damage will already have been done....

the last time i spoke to a WDFW officer (late December), we talked about this almost to a T... we were talking about people calling in threats, and he said that many times people falsely report things they think they "see"... there was an incident that people called to say that a guy had a AR and was waving it around in his back yard, they responded, equipped with their own rifles, come around the back of the building, and the guy is back there with a fvcking BROOM....

saying sh!t that isnt true can get people in trouble, or killed....