ok rowv, let's talk about this supposed evidence YOU have to support YOUR conspiracy theory....

yes, i AM asking you to discard what you 'saw and heard' on that day in order to investigate for yourself what happened. To look at whatever evidence exists and decide if there are any remaining unanswered questions. ...

....what I expect from most is to call me a crackpot and run the other direction instead while deriding my cockamamie ideas.

....and then the rest of us are left to wonder no more how 'they pulled it off?'.

Given a choice between an explanation that tastes like cake and one that tastes like schiznit we will invariably choose cake. (I think I may have also just come up with an explanation for bovine america, but that's another thread.....:))

Aunty

There is more hard evidence to support the theory of controlled demolition then there is the official explanation of collapse by fire. There are witnesses that say they heard explosions prior to the planes hitting, including people who were in the basement at the time and actually saw the damage caused by them.

A substantial number of 9/11 victims family members are asking for answers to the questions unanswered in reports by congress, FEMA and NIST. If nothing else we owe it to to them undertake this investigation. Lets's do as we say and honor our fallen firefighting/policeman heroes by answering their families questions, NO MATTER HOW DIFFICULT, COSTLY and TIME CONSUMING that may be.

...focus on WTC7...watch the video of it coming down and see if it jibes with the official story, collapse by fire...where is the evidence that fire alone can weaken steel structures? Certainly there are other cases (probably where construction standards are weaker?) where fire alone has brought down a steel and concrete structure...Ask yourself why it looks like a controlled demolition

I don't pretend to 'know' who is responsible but as soon as you start to look at who benefitted from the collapse, the idea that there was enough money and logistical support to accomplish the task seems at least plausible...

.....back to the thermite for a sec....

...let's come up with an alternate explanation for finding UFG (weapons grade)thermite in the dust from 9/11...

This repoort establishes scientifically that they have found this dust....is this not a smoking gun??