Well Mike.......if you look hard at who had offices in the building, what kinds of documents were stored there and the size of the insurance payment versus the assessed value of the building its not very hard to find potential suspects if that's what you are looking for...I can give you some nudges if you'd like but the info is readily available and crosscheckable.

...it is also very, very difficult to convince me that 'the terrorists' have received any benefit whatsoever from the WTC disaster. Yes, you could pose the argument that their benefit is of a spiritual nature but, you would first have to show that the motives of al qaeda are spiritual. 'Osama Bin Laden' and his minions are motivated by power and money and they use religion as their shield. Can we agree that this is the pattern amongst extreme muslim groups? In terms of advancing their agenda of power perpetrating an attack on WTC should have seemed like a pretty bad idea, IMO.

wtc7 looks so much like a controlled demolition that questions come awfully easily. It was not hit by a plane. It can be categorically demonstrated with videotape that if there was extensive damage to the building, it was on only one side. Look at the videos again in that context...

I don't want to believe what I see either. No way....but there it is.