#1052263 - 05/22/21 10:44 AM
Washington Dems Reject Dam Removal
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 05/22/05
Posts: 3771
|
What a bunch of self severing dickheads.
OK fine they reject removing the four lower Snake River Dams to recover ESA listed salmon.
So what their plan to recover these fish?
http://www.yelmonline.com/stories/gov-inslee-washington-states-us-senators-reject-gop-congressmans-pitch-on-lower-snake-river,265407
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1052266 - 05/22/21 11:13 AM
Re: Washington Dems Reject Dam Removal
[Re: Illahee]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 05/22/05
Posts: 3771
|
Although Oregon lawmakers support the removal they have their own darkside.
Oregon lawmakers of both parties have bellied up to the all you can take timber industry money trough.
The number one inhibitor for recovery of north coastal salmon and steelhead is water quality.
The department of environmental quality hasn't enforced federal clean water standards in over 10 years.
North coastal rivers and streams water temps reach the lethal rage numerous times every summer.
Then the rivers pump mud all winter.
This is the reason I no longer support the Democratic party of Oregon.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1052269 - 05/22/21 11:21 AM
Re: Washington Dems Reject Dam Removal
[Re: Illahee]
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 02/15/21
Posts: 340
|
What a bunch of self severing dickheads.
OK fine they reject removing the four lower Snake River Dams to recover ESA listed salmon.
So what their plan to recover these fish The Plan : Getting you’un and us’ns off the fish in the end...
_________________________
Making Puget Sound Great Again - 2025 Year of the Pinks!
South Sound’s Humpy Promotional Director.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1052271 - 05/22/21 12:21 PM
Re: Washington Dems Reject Dam Removal
[Re: Illahee]
|
Three Time Spawner
Registered: 09/07/05
Posts: 1867
Loc: Spokane WA
|
I don't see the dams ever being removed, far too expensive and would take a very long time.
At best, the average state resident is only going to give lip service to saving fish. Implementing a multi billion $ (before cost overruns) project that would take several decades to complete, ain't gonna fly.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1052272 - 05/22/21 12:35 PM
Re: Washington Dems Reject Dam Removal
[Re: Illahee]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 05/22/05
Posts: 3771
|
That's because you are stupid.
The plan is to remove the earthen part of the dams and let the river run around them.
BPA's balls are in a money vise, rates have risen 30%, renewables are producing more and cheaper power.
2028 BPA renegotiates their PUD contracts, that is when the real sh1t hits the fan.
BPA's future plan is become a energy transmission manager.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1052273 - 05/22/21 01:01 PM
Re: Washington Dems Reject Dam Removal
[Re: Illahee]
|
BUCK NASTY!!
Registered: 01/26/00
Posts: 6312
Loc: Vancouver, WA
|
Although Oregon lawmakers support the removal they have their own darkside.
Oregon lawmakers of both parties have bellied up to the all you can take timber industry money trough.
The number one inhibitor for recovery of north coastal salmon and steelhead is water quality.
The department of environmental quality hasn't enforced federal clean water standards in over 10 years.
North coastal rivers and streams water temps reach the lethal rage numerous times every summer.
Then the rivers pump mud all winter.
This is the reason I no longer support the Democratic party of Oregon. Welcome to becoming a Republican, I can call you normal now.... Keith
_________________________
It's time to put the red rubber nose away, clown seasons over.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1052274 - 05/22/21 01:01 PM
Re: Washington Dems Reject Dam Removal
[Re: Illahee]
|
Three Time Spawner
Registered: 09/07/05
Posts: 1867
Loc: Spokane WA
|
What makes you think that plan will be quick and cheap?
Just the plan will take a decade to complete.
I'm not saying they shouldn't be removed, only that if it happens it will be a long way off in the future.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1052276 - 05/22/21 01:33 PM
Re: Washington Dems Reject Dam Removal
[Re: stlhdr1]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 05/22/05
Posts: 3771
|
Although Oregon lawmakers support the removal they have their own darkside.
Oregon lawmakers of both parties have bellied up to the all you can take timber industry money trough.
The number one inhibitor for recovery of north coastal salmon and steelhead is water quality.
The department of environmental quality hasn't enforced federal clean water standards in over 10 years.
North coastal rivers and streams water temps reach the lethal rage numerous times every summer.
Then the rivers pump mud all winter.
This is the reason I no longer support the Democratic party of Oregon. Welcome to becoming a Republican, I can call you normal now.... Keith Sorry Keith I said I didn't support the Democratic Party of Oregon, not that I got a frontal lobodomy.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1052277 - 05/22/21 01:35 PM
Re: Washington Dems Reject Dam Removal
[Re: ondarvr]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 05/22/05
Posts: 3771
|
What makes you think that plan will be quick and cheap?
Just the plan will take a decade to complete.
I'm not saying they shouldn't be removed, only that if it happens it will be a long way off in the future. Again with the numbnuts crap. The money is part of the infrastructure plan, you know the one the Republicans don't like.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1052278 - 05/22/21 02:45 PM
Re: Washington Dems Reject Dam Removal
[Re: Illahee]
|
Spawner
Registered: 04/13/20
Posts: 714
|
I'm sure it's a super big priority right now. Dams, lol.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1052279 - 05/22/21 03:32 PM
Re: Washington Dems Reject Dam Removal
[Re: JussieSmolt]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 05/22/05
Posts: 3771
|
I'm sure it's a super big priority right now. Dams, lol. According to the Republicans none of it is a priority, nothing tops the big fvckin lie though, now that's really important. Stop the stupid.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1052281 - 05/22/21 05:35 PM
Re: Washington Dems Reject Dam Removal
[Re: Illahee]
|
Three Time Spawner
Registered: 09/07/05
Posts: 1867
Loc: Spokane WA
|
So far there is no money, only a proposal put forth to spend a great deal on various infrastructure needs.
Every politician is looking for a way get as much of that not yet in existence pile of cash to spend as possible.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1052282 - 05/22/21 05:55 PM
Re: Washington Dems Reject Dam Removal
[Re: Illahee]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 05/22/05
Posts: 3771
|
I think the part they don't like is having the people who didn't need a tax cut paying for part of it.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1052283 - 05/22/21 09:33 PM
Re: Washington Dems Reject Dam Removal
[Re: Illahee]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 03/15/99
Posts: 4166
Loc: Poulsbo, WA,USA
|
Settle down Illahee. The Republicans have opposed dam removal before.
_________________________
I'd Rather Be Fishing for Summer Steelhead!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1052285 - 05/22/21 11:16 PM
Re: Washington Dems Reject Dam Removal
[Re: Illahee]
|
I'm Idaho!
Registered: 08/15/14
Posts: 3456
|
What a bunch of self severing dickheads.
OK fine they reject removing the four lower Snake River Dams to recover ESA listed salmon.
So what their plan to recover these fish?
http://www.yelmonline.com/stories/gov-inslee-washington-states-us-senators-reject-gop-congressmans-pitch-on-lower-snake-river,265407 Clickbait. Not a legitimate source. Do better ilahhee
_________________________
Mods = hall monitors
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1052287 - 05/23/21 09:37 AM
Re: Washington Dems Reject Dam Removal
[Re: dwatkins]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 05/22/05
Posts: 3771
|
What a bunch of self severing dickheads.
OK fine they reject removing the four lower Snake River Dams to recover ESA listed salmon.
So what their plan to recover these fish?
http://www.yelmonline.com/stories/gov-inslee-washington-states-us-senators-reject-gop-congressmans-pitch-on-lower-snake-river,265407 Clickbait. Not a legitimate source. Do better ilahhee You're not very smart are you?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1052291 - 05/23/21 07:35 PM
Re: Washington Dems Reject Dam Removal
[Re: Illahee]
|
I'm Idaho!
Registered: 08/15/14
Posts: 3456
|
You're not very smart are you?
What shehe’s mirror says to him each morning.
_________________________
Mods = hall monitors
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
883
Guests and
2
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
11498 Members
17 Forums
72910 Topics
824633 Posts
Max Online: 3937 @ 07/19/24 03:28 AM
|
|
|
Previous Topic
Index
