Rob,
I certainly agree that anglers, as a group, will probably never play a 'major' political role but not because we are to small of a group but rather because we are much too diverse in our many ways.
We represent, with a few exceptions such as animal rights advocates, most every political, philosophical, ethnic, religious and occupational class. We number in the tens of millions and practice or aspire to learn most every imaginable angling technique. We have thousands of fishing clubs as diverse and contradictory in their membership, philosophy and purpose as the anglers they represent.
We even have a few organizations that seek to represent the angling community as a whole by sticking to the broad angling related issues aside from those issues important to special interests within the diverse angling community.
By joining and contributing to one of the many organizations that act as advocates for special interests we can promote those interests but when a special interest involves the exclusion of other interests we contribute towards dividing the community as a whole.
By joining and contributing to one of the few organizations that act as advocates for the whole community we do have the opportunity to move towards developing a unified political voice for all anglers.
Edit:
BTW: I am still wondering, what, in your opinion, are some of the things that are really important to focus on?
_________________________
Why are "wild fish" made of meat?