In light of the rampant explosion in indian gaming why do the tribes even bother fishing? I say it is just because they can. Poverty and alcoholism are still raging on the Rez but the money is pouring in..The following is a reprint of a recent report on tribal gaming :


Tribal casinos surpass all other gambling businesses in Washington
by The Associated Press
Reprinted with permission from the Associated Press.


SPOKANE – Tribal casinos in Washington now take in more money than the state lottery, pull-tabs, cardrooms, bingo and horse racing combined.

The tribes’ share of Washington’s gambling market rose from 40 percent to 53 percent in the past two years, state Gambling Commission Director Rick Day recently told a legislative committee.

The commission estimates that tribal net receipts – the amount wagered minus prizes paid out – rose from roughly $422 million in 2001 to $700 million this year.

During the same time, pull-tab sales and charity bingo games have lost millions of dollars in net receipts. The state lottery has seen sales drop $33 million since 2001.

It’s a worrisome trend for people like Don Kaufman, general managing director of Big Brothers/Big Sisters of Spokane, which operates a bingo hall to raise money.

“I think there’s a definite relationship there,” he said. “People who gamble only have so many dollars.”

In 1992, Kaufman said, his group earned $690,000 from its bingo hall. Today, that’s dwindled to $210,000, and more than half of that comes from renting out the property, particularly empty parking spaces.

State Rep. John McCoy, a Tulalip tribal leader, said tribal casinos can’t be blamed for all the reduction in lottery and bingo revenue. He thinks those games simply don’t appeal to younger people.

“Yes, we’ve had some impact on the lottery, but I’m not willing to say we’re the entire reason,” he said. “Before we brought in machines, it appeared that the lottery had plateaued.”

He also points to the direct benefits of tribal gambling: health centers, jobs, scholarships and economic development, much of it benefiting nontribal residents.

Statewide, the competition for gambling dollars will soon get fiercer. The Tulalip Tribes opened a $78 million casino complex north of Seattle this past summer. The Puyallups are working on a $200 million one to the south. And the Stillaguamish, Snoqualmie and Cowlitz tribes are also considering opening casinos near Arlington, Snoqualmie and La Center.

Over the past five years, according to the National Indian Gaming Commission, tribal gaming revenues nationwide rose from $8.5 billion to $14.5 billion and from a market share of 15 percent to 21 percent.

Critics contend the tribes’ success is the result of electronic gambling machines that other gambling facilities are not allowed to offer.

Washington’s 27 tribes that have reached compacts with the state have more than 13,000 such machines.

“They have a monopoly on the most popular gaming device on the planet,” said Linda Matson, executive director of Washington’s Entertainment Industry Coalition.

In a few weeks, her group, which includes nontribal cardrooms, bingo halls, bars, restaurants and bowling alleys, will again try to convince the state Legislature to allow them to have the machines.

Her group tried the same thing last session, only to be rebuffed by lawmakers who said they didn’t want to add thousands more slot machines across the state.

Ron Allen, former president of the National Congress of American Indians, said the tribes will fight any such proposal.

“I don’t give them good odds,” said Allen, chairman of the Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe.

Tribes say it’s wrong for people like Matson to try to equate bowling alleys and other private businesses with tribal casinos.

Although untaxed by the state, McCoy said, tribes spend their casino profits locally, on jobs, education, construction and other things that benefit the surrounding economy.


NOTICE THE KEY SENTENCE: "Although untaxed by the state.........." Taxes that pay for services they use and roads they drive on...military that keeps them safe....Coast Guard....on and on and on. So with all their money why do they bother fishing?

Now, Native Americans remain at the bottom in almost every measurable economic category. Indians earn only a little more than half as much money as the average American -- less money per capita than whites, blacks, Asian Americans and Hispanics. Nearly a third of Native Americans live in poverty, which is more than twice the rate for Americans in general. And Indians are far more liable to succumb to diseases associated with the poor -- four times as likely to die of alcoholism, three times as likely to die of tuberculosis, nearly twice as likely to die of diabetes.

It appears to me that all the special rights afforded indian tribes are nothing more than crutches and hand outs. Historically all the programs of the BIA have been a dismal disaster. Maybe if we had left well enough alone many years ago the tribes would have competed in society like every other race. The welfare system has simply created a nation of underachievers trapped in a viscious cycle of poverty and alcoholism. Atleast the Tulalips and Muckleshoots are starting to do something for their people but the tiny minority on top is still skimming all the cream. The rank and file are still poor and lagging further and further behind even as casino revenues shoot through the roof. So I guess they fish because they still have to. Too bad.

As one Tulalip fishermen once told me "If you had the choice, wouldn't you rather be out here on this beautiful bay tending your nets rather than standing on your feet all night while dealing cards and choking on cig smoke."

Can't say that I disagreed with him.

BD

[QUOTE]Originally posted by grandpa2:
[QB] In light of the rampant explosion in Indian gaming why do the tribes even bother fishing? I say it is just because they can.


I say it's because they enjoy it. I many commercial fishermen, tribal and nontribal, fish for the same reasons we do. They like the outdoors, they like the challenge and they like competing with each other. And it may well be the tradition they grew up with.

Also, do not forget that not all tribes are doing that well and not all tribal members benefit from the huge profits.

Bill Gates has made a ton of money. I haven't seen much of it. Your question could be turned around to ask if you have so much money, why do you fish?

Please do not think I am a supporter of tribal fishing rights. I am not. I think Bolt was wrong! But I have learned to accept the fact that like it or not, it is the law of our land.

I believe all concerned would have been better off if we interpreted the "fish in common" language as allowing them to fish under the same rules as all of us. I would even go so far as to give them some sort of priority in obtaining commercial licenses, but that’s, as far I would go. Still I can understand their desire to be on the water and to make a living from the rivers and oceans.

you guys pretty much said my answer... because they can. Personally I believe the days of netting for money should be over.

Fish for heritage, fish for religious ceremony, but please dont fish for asia...

I just hope that some day the WDFW doesn't screw me out of passing my heritage to my son so some "true" natives can sell fish in commercial markets!

I don't remember the chief's name and I can't recall the quote exactly but I think it was a Hudson's Bay Captain who offered the chief and his tribal members steady work and two weeks off per year. The chief replied "before the white man we only worked two weeks a year".

Sooooo AFTER the white man do they work more than two weeks a year? Some sure do but alot do not. Why bother with all that free stuff. I think there may be some romance left in the troll fleet but netting Chums for eggs lacks a certain appeal of the good old outdoors.

The native americans that only worked two weeks a year lived off those that worked all year... :p

Living off the land is a full time job!

Piper,

According to the author of Guns, Germs, and Steel, an anthology of human societal development, people in subsistence societies tend to average about 4 hours a day in living off the land. Greed evolved and is a learned human attribute.

Grandpa,

As already mentioned, treaty fishermen continue to fish because they can, because they enjoy it, and because it's the most viable economic activity readily available to some. That said, I'll repeat: the market is having a serious effect on treaty fishing. I've known a young Indian who is now his Tribe's fisheries manager. He told me that for three seasons now, the tribe has used casino revenue to pay several Tribal fishermen to exercise the Tribe's treaty fishing right by paying the difference between the ex-vessel price for fish and the cost of fishing. They sell some of this catch and use the rest for Tribal ceremonies and subsistence.

I'm all for them fishing for ceremonial and subsistence use, but fishing for chum eggs for Asia seems undignified to me.

Sincerely,

Salmo g.

but they didn't have email and the internet to distract them

It pains me to say it, but it's all our own fault ( or our ancestors). They should have been assimilated just like every other culture before them in the history of mankind.

I hold no ill will towards native americans, but I abhore what we have allowed them to become. It's no wonder they point the finger at us & blame all their ills against us.

And by continuing the status quo it will only perpetuate their demise. They may enjoy special rights but at what cost to their culture & collective conscience?

"I am 100% in agreement with this. If the Native people had to compete, grow, learn and adapt to society then none of these problems would exist today."

I find this statement objectionable to the extreme. Why not just say "if they tried to be more like white people"...it's the exact same thing and equally as racist, IMO.

Many of the Indians in South/Central America and Mexico were assimilated into colonial society and look at the problems there.

You are oversimplifying the problem, and it doesn't do much good to say if they had been assimilated things would be just perfect.

I love the Indian and think it's wondeful that they are surviving the holocaust. Maybe you should give them small pox blankets in exchange for those treaty rights they bargained for. That would get rid of your Indian problems for sure, but hopefully in this climate of hate and war this administration want turn a blind eye and allow it, just to get your vote in 2004. After all, hate and fear gets votes, doesn't it?

Same ole nasty hate, when will it ever end? One might think that the purpose of INDIAN threads like this one is to make the INDIAN as a people another of our many "Axis of Evil" targets. Indian wars re-visited. I'm not Indian but I get concerned when I read where a hater is trying to package all Indians as less deserving of respect that he is. What about all the Indians ( the majority) that are doing their best in getting out of life, that which is important to them, and not what's important to us, the White man? Why would Indian's, as a people, look to anyone of us on this board for guidance? We need to look closely at how we live our own lives and stop hating on people just because of skin color.

There is only one Judge and that's God, which is not you or me. Peace on Earth and good will to all men.

John Lee,
I dont believe there is anything being said about hating indians, it more about hating the measures they have had to take to get by...
Thats all...

I respect their ancient heritage and culture and the wish there was more of that taught to the younger generations. We need more respect for the environment and less of the how much can we take and sell...

Peace

Piper

It was not you that I was referring to at all. You are cool with me as many others are.

I just think that coming from where we sit, it is hard to see that what looks easy for us, (the white Monday morning quarterback of Indian chiefs)) is not so easy if you had to walk a mile in their shoes.

In a struggle to survive, sometimes those that are doing the struggling are not as politically correct in the choices they have to make in their day to day struggles as indicated in our past with the slaughter of the Buffallo. I'm sure the Indian were as disgusted with that as we are with nets and such today. How about posting about clear cutting, watershed issues, global warming and other environmental issues which impacts fish. Issues we can discuss and can make a difference? That would mean that we would have to criticize politicians and some of us will never criticize the current administration in any thread, for any reason, wheather it be fish, the Environment, you name it , but time and time again, will blast the Indian. I find it hipocritical and wrong.

As to why they commercially fish I agree with what Mr Vedder says they enjoy it just the same as we do sport fishing. I used to fish commercially in Alaska years ago and I can honestly say it is the only job that I have had that I truly enjoyed. Should they still fish ? I think so for ceremony's and such but I feel they should use historical methods or sport fish gear. As far as some people feeling sorry for them maybe a 100 or so years ago I might have, today not a chance. I feel that their alcoholism, low self esteem and other problems Is not helped by receiving handouts and not having to go out and earn a living like most folks do. As for any debt owed to them I feel it was payed for long before I was ever around. If it weren't for the bleeding heart, goodie too shoes kind of mentality of today they would be a lot better off in my opinion.