We shouldn't let the the idea that many people may have been involved get in the way of a thorough a examination of the evidence.
This is the crux of my entire argument. An official and thorough examination of the evidence has never been done. The 9/11 commission was an unmitigated political farce which accomplished nothing, lay responsibility for the numerous security breakdowns at the feet of no one and approached its investigation like Mr. Magoo on quaaludes.
If you look at the smoking gun thread I explain briefly one way the demo could have been accomplished....which actually has some corroborating eyewitness testimony.
Here's another looneytunes wack job anti-patriot domestic terrorist:
Col. Ronald D. Ray, U.S. Marine Corps (ret)
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense during Reagan Administration. Highly decorated Vietnam veteran (two Silver Stars, a Bronze Star and a Purple Heart). Appointed by President George H.W. Bush to serve on American Battle Monuments Commission. From 1990 to 1994, served as Military Historian and Deputy Director of Field Operations for U.S. Marine Corps Historical Center, Washington, D.C.
The former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under the Reagan Administration and a highly decorated Vietnam veteran and Colonel has gone on the record to voice his doubts about the official story of 9/11 - calling it ‘the dog that doesn't hunt.' Ray questioned the feasibility of having a budget of half a trillion dollars a year, yet not even being able to defend the Pentagon. 'Half a trillion dollars a year and a bunch of guys over in a cave in Afghanistan were able to penetrate that half a trillion dollar network that's supposed to provide Americans with national security?'
Previous Topic
Index
