Apparently your friends know as much about reality as you do.

Fish on...

Todd

I was, so that makes you much older than I am.

So Hank, you are saying that because your friend couldn't find weed in Tacoma in 1968, we must only have Cali weed here in WA in 2013.

Your logic is about as high caliber as other outspoken Republicans these days. Which is to say, it is the caliber of a cap gun.

Yea, the Cali tourists that have moved here have changed this place. My family didn't show up until 1896 but have managed to have roads named after them in 3 counties. Not a record but you might say we're locals. Of course, my Indian cousin's families showed up a bit sooner.
Hank - in 1968, we had the Sky River Rock Festival and LIghter than Air Fair and there were some bands there you may have heard of: http://www.historylink.org/index.cfm?DisplayPage=output.cfm&File_Id=5425

Just when you think Hank couldn't make himself loook any dumber.

No pot in T-Town in the 60's
Please......

Hey.........he heard it from ONE guy, so it must be true.

And we're still using those strains from '68 up here, too................right?

i fu*king LOL'd

The quality of cheeba if through the roof up this way. people are straight up pot snobs...... I think the indoor revolution and crossbreeding has taken it up a step

Hankster, I think you new nickname should be Cap Gun.

It is perfect because we can't tell when you are being serious or not and it doesn't matter anyway because in the end you are just a source of loud noises.

Only on the Dark Side can I find someone who insists on being as dumb as Slab. Your box of rocks isn't missing you. If you'd been paying attention, which appears to be above your skill grade, no one suggested that ". . . adding drugs for public use is a good idea." That is crap you're making up apparently due to your lack of comprehension.

The drugs are already here and available to that segment of the public that wants them. What we are discussing is the legal status of the drugs. Declaring the drugs legal or illegal has only a little bearing on their availability, none on how good they are for people, and next to none on people's decision to use or not use. I guess this is hard for you to understand, so please read it two or three times.

And we are not saying that ". . . it is stupid to think that clear thinking is less desirable." Just the opposite in fact. Clear thinking, thinking logically and analytically, is how some of us learned that doing what we've been doing - the War on Drugs - over and over for decades and expecting a different result (definition of insanity, remember) is from a lack of clear thinking. I didn't realize until now that simple concepts of logic are beyond your grasp. I'm sorry for you.

Indeed, we will have data within a few years, and it may be possible to make some useful comparisons, but automatically assuming that is true is another of your examples of your unclear thinking.

And no, I'm not a doper. I'm a concerned American who absolutely hates ignorance, and am doing my best to stamp it out. You are making that very difficult, however. And I hate it even more when I have to help pay for that ignorance through my taxes.

Sg

Slamo G Layin it down on slabby and tellin it like it is, love it.

Truth is Slab, It really is difficult to find cold hard facts on the effects of marijuana, because it seems as if every article on the topic tries to support their point of view on the subject. There is a ton of BS out there one has to weed(pun) through, all the same BS which has likely succeeded in brainwashing you into making the statements you do.

The truth about Cigarettes is much more available, to those who care to look for the facts: Click me Slabby

Slab doesn't get that whole freedom thing. He'd like his own kid to carry a rap sheet for smoking weed.
Hankster.....your friend couldn't score because we don't sell to dweebs up here.
Joad is just a pinhead. No drug, legal or otherwise, can fix him.

And how many people smoke 20 cigarettes a day, versus how many smoke three joints a day?

Which one costs more hundreds of billions of dollars in health care costs?

If anyone is comparing pot to alcohol or tobacco and saying how much worse pot is, on any level whatsoever, then that person is an idiot.

Fish on...

Todd

"than cigarettes made from tobacco alone."

What percentage of cig's smoked are made from tobacco alone and don't include Benzine, Ammonia, Formaldehyde, Acetone, Nicotine, Carbon Monoxide, Rat Poison, Cyanide.

We legally allow companies to add this sh!t to smokes and peddle them to the masses but we ban a chemical free natural plant with no additives?

Hank has only uncovered the beginning of how bad it is!

The "not funny" part of that video, APKD, is that the exact same type of lying SOB's who made it in the first place are still alive and well, and just as fullofshit.

Fish on...

Todd

I don't think anyone said it was harmless...but it causes far less health problems than cigarettes have, and it causes far less social problems than alcohol has...yet we sell, and tax those like mfr's.

The ones who think pot is worse are the same ones who think absitinence only education stops unwanted pregnancies, that the Earth is 6000 years old, and that there is a "war on Christmas".

Fish on...

Todd

Smoking anything isn't good for you.

Neither is playing in the freeway.

So, moving on...................

Indeed.

But we don't really need a law that prohibits you from doing so should you choose to, though, do we?