I'm a firm believer that the difference between being delusional and skeptical, falls in the category of having a closed mind.

Delusional:

When your mind is closed, it doesn't matter if your wearing tin foil or not because everything that contradicts reality lives right between your two eyes. It's your brains way of taking information and spinning it to fit your own agenda.

Skeptical

:Skepticism or scepticism (see spelling differences) is generally any questioning attitude towards unempirical knowledge or opinions/beliefs stated as facts,[1] or doubt regarding claims that are taken for granted elsewhere.[2] Skepticism is often separated into categories, related to morality (right or wrong), religion (religious doubt), or the nature of knowledge ("there is no knowledge beyond how things appear.")[3]

Now we're getting somewhere

This is one concept I could never get my head around;

Why is it that as a cop that you are considered credible in any court of law regarding matters of people's freedom and the constitution, but that same cop who sees a Bigfoot on duty in plain sight and is trained to properly observe, identify and document that's not the same thing.

Does this make sense?

This is one concept I could never get my head around;

Why is it that as a cop that you are considered credible in any court of law regarding matters of people's freedom and the constitution, but that same cop who sees a Bigfoot on duty in plain sight and is trained to properly observe, identify and document that's not the same thing.

Does this make sense?

As a cop you are in the business of collecting evidence! Observe, identify, and document..... These three things give you credibility based on your background and training and presents factual evidence to an otherwise unknown situation.

Kind of like proving the existence of Bigfeet

Then why are we still sceptical regarding bigfoot, UFO's and stuff like that. I am one of many on duty cops who has personally witnessed something like this under circumstances where it was impossible to misidentify.

Why was I not fired from my job for being delusional? Why was I still aloud to testify in court as a credible law enforcement officer?

Why is not my eye witness account considered evidence beyond any reasonable doubt? It was regarding matters of criminal conduct why not regarding Bigfoot.

I know that in the 1990's The lead ONP scientist had a first hand sighting of a Bigfoot in the park in the upper Nooch. He told Jeff Meldrum about it and also told him that 4 bioligests who worked under him also had daylight sightings in the Park. He said that none the less Bigfoot is not real as far as the ONP and the US govt is concerned.

That is just crazy as far as I am concerned.

It all goes back to evidence and has nothing to do with eye witness and he said/she said b.s. How does the general public know you saw one? You guys see a black stump or a black bear stand up and it's immediately a Squatch. Get a clear video, pic, hair sample, anything tangible and you gain credibility. A house slap, woodknock, whoop, scream, or anything else that goes bump in the night does not count as evidence!

I supplied 37 samples, (36 hair and 1 saliva), which were extensivly scrutinized and DNA tested, everything short of full Genome. Thousands of tracks have been found d and casted which show dermal ridges, natural flexation and so on.

So what is the problem? Plenty of evidence to prove it in court???

A track of what? If you don't have a clear picture/video or a body/remains, then what are you trying to get out of a track? If you have conclusive evidence of a creature then it's evidence can be directly traced back to it..... I'm skeptical because of lack of evidence, not delusional because I believe in something which the evidence doesn't support..

First of all BF does not exist. With the millions of hunters in this country, many of them have several game cameras everywhere. They would have put one down by now or at least a picture (not fuzzy). Lot's of these kooks also believe O.J Simpson was not guilty. It just blows my mind how stupid and gullible these kooks are. The only thing in the woods I keep close to mind are MT Lions and two legged drug crazed knuckle heads.

I have to agree with this. They had a 15 minute video beat down of Rodney King and the officers were acquitted. Those officers watching this should have arrested as many as possible....all about the thin blue line.

So what have I seen then?

Why did I spend so much time looking for answers? Why was I so compelled?

I just don't know what to say regarding someone who says "Bigfoot does not exist". Tell that to the literally thousands of people that have seen them.

Why do you think you can be so arrogant to make a statement like that regarding something you have no knowledge of?

A shrink is above my pay scale.

Thousands out of 330 million of people in this country is minute.

It was generally accepted by dumbfucks that believe in bullsh!t like gnomes and hairy creatures that travel between dimensions.

The evidence that the Earth wasn't flat and it wasn't the center of the universe, either, was always there. Where's the evidence of gnomes and Bigfeet that travel between dimensions?

That's right - there isn't any. At least any credible evidence, so stop with the aplles and oranges comparisons.

If I was you, Carcassman, I'd go see a doctor. You seem to have gone off your rocker in the past few weeks.

Dont listen to the haters Rich G. I believe you.

Gnomes...good gravy.