Good news for Washington gun owners.

http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/index.cfm?fa=opinions.showOpinion&filename=821542MAJ

You mean gun owners who are minors. Just what we need. 17 year olds running around with loaded 38's. I haven't met too many 17 year olds that I would deem rational enough to be packing. Recipe for disaster.

What's next the baby rattle/derringer?

Don't worry, President Obama will be along soon enough to take them away. Right after Sharia Law and the transcend to socialism. You'll still have something to cower about.

It's OK gogirly I ate me bacon this morn.....

TMI. What you do with your daughter is your business.

Classy.....

Thank you.

Actually it shows whatta phucking douchebag you are..something many of us already knew.

Bringing kids into it is pathetic...and something you wouldn't do were we face to face.

Good work by Justice Sanders.

Sg

Agreed. Interesting read and a well though out opinion.

Although I misread it I wonder why you would consider this "good" for Gun Owners? Isn't limiting the right to adults anti NRA?

That 17 year old should feel lucky he's alive.

Not sure I agree on making the 17 year old an example for case law, but I agree supporting Heller. What about concealed weapons?

I like part, but not all.

I'll take that bet.

Looking forward to it.

Of course you didn't; they wouldn't give you any rounds for it after they noticed you held it with the pointy end facing the wrong way.

That was totally uncalled for.....Even here on the Dark Side......

It was and the douchebag doesn't realize it.

But she wants to take my bet... unfortunately I doubt she has the stones to follow thru.

But you know me .....I'd relish the chance to have her say that to my face.

Andy,

The way I read it, the court incorporated Heller, but remanded the main issues regarding the 17 year old back to the lower court, appeals or superior, I forget. They indicated that the kid's lawyer didn't satisfactorily address why the 2nd A vindicated his possession, since they were clear that even the Bill of Rights is not absolute, yelling "fire" in a crowded theater, etc.

I think the decision is good for WA because it establishes the right to bear as individual, apart from organized militia. I expect this will be pivotal over time.

Sg

It was a bit confusing to me, so I guess I missed that part. The wife is a juvenile probation officer, so I would like to see the kids who violate the law get punished, especially since she could get caught in the crossfire. Thanks for the clarification.