Actually, I don't want to assume why RvW thinks the list of things in Leviticus is "lame"...I'll let him explain it himself...sorry for speaking for you.

Fish on...

Todd

http://www.thewrap.com/duck-dynasty-inside-decision-suspend-phil-robertson-exclusive/


It ain't the gay comments that bother me since I know gay people.
It's not the anti affair comments that bother me since I know people that have had them.

BUT

When he's anti bestiality it sure makes me wonder what type of people his family or friends are?

well duhhhh... his daughter-in-laws all married a Sasquatch...


Rumor has it, RichG is making a cameo on the season 5 opener

It's ok for employers to fire employees for any reason that's not prohibited by law...and if anyone employed by me made any bigoted statements I'd shitcan them, too.

Phil can't have it both ways...he can't judge people based on what's in the Bible, then say he doesn't...all the while being a total hypocrite himself for violating a plethora of Bible prohibitions right there in the exact same book.

He may be trying to not sound like a complete waste of air like Slappy does all the time, but it doesn't make him any more of a valuable air user, either, to think the exact same way.

Fish on...

Todd

LOL!

Fish on...

Todd

"That's why RvW thinks it's "lame"...because he is not only juding in violation of Christian principles, he's likely in violation of a dozen or two dozen direct prohibitions in Leviticus, too."


I'm not judging gays. As a matter of fact I have very good friends that are gay. One of my gay friends is a black (heaven forbid) gay man....he'll be joining my family at our house for Christmas since he is like family to us. I find it very hard to believe a man of his character would not be allowed into heaven or that God "hates" him because of his sexuality. I just get tired of the hate on both sides of the issue.

I'd prefer to let people live their life as they see fit as long as their choices don't hurt anyone else.

The God I believe in is a loving God....a God that would welcome my friend and others like him with open arms. If I'm wrong then God may not want me because I choose not to judge or hate someone based solely upon their sexuality.

Being religious doesn't make you any less a bigot.

What do you call someone who makes bigoted statements, then quotes the Bible as justification?

And there's plenty of Bible thumpers that say there's nothing in the Bible against homosexuals.
Either way he's a douchebag dumbfuc.

That's what makes people like you so distasteful, classless and ignorant. You preach tolerance but don't practice it; you demand respect but don't reciprocate nor deserve it; you expect decency but exemplify rudeness. You require freedom but are a classic example of slavery to stupidity.

Sorry no respect for bigots hiding behind the Bible.
Funny how you feel the truth is distasteful, perhaps thinking about it might help.

and bigots hiding behind keyboards are more respectable?




Do me a favor and tell me what the truth is so that I don't have to think....

How am I a bigot?
And the truth is Phil's a douchebag bigot.

How about that....


you just answered your own question

So pointing out that Phil's a bigot, makes me a bigot?

+1,000,000
I couldn't agree with this more.

This is a thread just like the "bead" thread.......way over thought.
Someone seriously needs to look up the word "bigot".....AGAIN!!
All who post here with strong opinions and a desire (need) to convert others to their belief system..... IS A BIGOT!! Me......Todd....KK....Reefer.......on and on.....non tolerance is key to being a bigot......

Congrats?

Laughing at a flaming gay.....who can resist......we love freaks......go ahead admit it.

......

If you call someone a bigot, does that make you a bigot? God, it's all sooo confusing.

From Wickipedia:
Bigotry is the state of mind of a bigot: someone who, as a result of their prejudices, treats or views other people with fear, distrust, hatred, contempt, or intolerance on the basis of a person's opinion, ethnicity, race, religion, national origin, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, socioeconomic status, or other characteristics.

I just love how Hank thinks Phil was unfairly fired, then proceeds to argue that employees shouldn't be allowed to be terminated for things they did away from/prior to employment...

Sounds kinda like a position a lefty/liberal/union would take.

The America loving/small government/"conservatives" in the room should take the opposite position and protect the Job Creators at A&E, no?

B

Maybe I am slow but I don't really understand how this topic got 12 pages (at least on my computer). I believe Phil had a right to say what he said (I don't feel it was actually that big of deal if you actually read the entire article/interview), I also believe A&E had a right to terminate his services.
In the end it will probably not hurt the shows ratings since the new season starts in January and 9 of 10 episodes have already been recorded, so either they will have to edit Phil out or he will still be in them. If anything the season premier will probably receive higher ratings this season than last (which was the highest for its category of a show in history) because people in support will tune in to see if he (Phil) is edited out. In the TV world drama equals ratings/money.