Originally Posted By: Salmo g.
L Louie,

Just because you suggest something, and include your reasoning, doesn't equal myth busting. Sorry, it doesn't work that way. The legal standard for persuasion in arguments or debate of this sort is clear, cogent, and convincing evidence. And it's generally missing from 99% of the posts in these on-going threads.

Sg


Salmo, can you provide any scientific evidence that shows that switching to a selective harvest method on the CR will result in ESA listed species recovery?
I'm not calling you out, just trying to find any science that says this plan is in fact a recovery effort.
All the information provided thus far seems to indicate that this plan is more faith based, rather than based in science.