Originally Posted By: OncyT
[quote=MPM]

Then WDFW also deserves derision as they are not responsible for ensuring that the tribes get their share of fish either. And I'm still looking for this "bad behavior" that you mention. The Muckleshoot Tribe, as near as I can tell, has done everything they said they intended to do in regard to managing their coho fishery.



The "bad behavior" in my view is taking a share of fish greater than their share allocated by treaty, and using the deck-stacked legal/political system to force WDFW to agree to that.

Has WDFW taken any position that would deny a treaty tribe their share of harvestable fish allocated by treaty? If not, then why would they deserve equal derision?