So you're ok with making allegations, but not worried about the proof. No moral problem with demonizing a non profit, involved in conservation.


Moving on....


Originally Posted By: SBD
No but there are some transcripts of a meeting I attended where a certain Houston based LNG group presented a plan to mitigate impacts by using
selective fishing idea's being presented by another Houston based so called conservation group... thumbs


Where can I get the transcripts?

http://tdn.com/news/local/article_8875ad54-5899-11df-a1a8-001cc4c002e0.html

Interesting that you don't have any harsh words for the mayor Diane Pohl. But Texas is fair game, even though the investment income could have come from any state. Its actually common for energy related companies to file Corporation papers in Texas. Northern Star Mining in Quebec is also filing for bankruptcy. Whether one is a partner of the other is anyones guess. If you look at Connecticut, its full of insurance companies.

On Wednesday, Clatskanie Mayor Diane Pohl called NorthernStar's collapse "a shame" and "a huge loss."
The terminal, she said, would have brought family wage jobs to the area, and some of the workers, no doubt, would have lived in Clatskanie, pumping dollars into the little town's economy.
"Hysteria and a lot of misinformation went around, and Bradwood hung around as long as they could," Pohl said. "It reflects on Oregon and the brutality of getting industry sited in this state. It's very difficult. It takes years, not months."


http://orsierraclub.wordpress.com/2010/0...eclare-victory/

Using SBD logic, if Salmon for all did not file a lawsuit to stop the LNG plant, then perhaps they also supported it. Seems to be the thought process.