Originally Posted By: OncyT

So it looks like WDFW is using an in-season update that shows more fish than thought to be returning to provide fisheries for their constituents. Sorta like some of the tribes have. But when it was the tribes the comments were "business as usual," "two sets of rules," "tribes don't GAF about conservation," "sad state of affairs," "protest fishery," 2nd class citizens," "fish-in," letters to state reps and senators," jar of Vaseline" & "incestuous relationship with the tribes" to pick a few.

This board is populated with a bunch of whiners.



OncyT, I think your comments in this thread have been very valuable, but I think you're mischaracterizing a lot (though maybe not all) of the comments.

WDFW and the Muckleshoots have now agreed on what most of the people in this thread though should be the case: either no fishing or both sides fishing. Now that they have gotten around to that, it doesn't make protesting against the prior situation somehow wrong.